Search Results

1. Tata v Tata - Waiwhakaata 3E 4C Lot 2A Block (Hiiona Marae) [2020] Maori Appellate Court MB 166 (2020 Appeal166) [pdf, 427 KB]

   ...Mrs Martin’s own 2015 quarterly report to the trustees indicates the access issue was not resolved. [136] Mrs Martin was present when the briefcase was handed to Mr and Mrs Tata and when they handed it back. She is also aware of the repeated requests from the applicants (both before and during this proceeding) seeking the accounts and financial records concerning the payments to her. [60] In terms of actual knowledge, Mrs Martin knew that the funds were paid to her in breach of...

2. D (D G Family Trust) v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0037 [pdf, 605 KB]

   IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-0037-2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN C F D, R D G AND D R S (AS TRUSTEES OF THE D G FAMILY TRUST Applicants AND IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Respondent AND MAX CONTRACTS LIMITED Second Respondent AND MAX EQ LIMITED Third Respondent AND ORANGE H MANAGEMENT LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP AND IN LIQUIDATION) Fourt

3. [2021] NZEnvC 165 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Toanga [pdf, 554 KB]

   ...and Ngāti Maniapoto, or by the public authorities involved in the granting of the Authority and related resource consents. When First Gas applied for a resource consent from the New Plymouth District Council to remove the pipeline, it was informed that Ngāti Tama were tangata whenua and that Poutama were not tangata whenua in the area affected. First Gas sought and obtained written approval from Ngāti Tama in relation to both the Archaeological [1 O] [11] [1 2] [13]

4. [2021] NZEnvC 165 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Toanga [pdf, 554 KB]

   ...and Ngāti Maniapoto, or by the public authorities involved in the granting of the Authority and related resource consents. When First Gas applied for a resource consent from the New Plymouth District Council to remove the pipeline, it was informed that Ngāti Tama were tangata whenua and that Poutama were not tangata whenua in the area affected. First Gas sought and obtained written approval from Ngāti Tama in relation to both the Archaeological [1 O] [11] [1 2] [13]

5. Appendix-10_Michael-Thompson_s87F-Report_Water-Take-and-Allocation_28-April-2023.pdf [pdf, 893 KB]

   ...Ecology (Dr Alex James) (iv) Accommodation Works Sheet 18, and; (v) Appendix 5 Proposed conditions (including refinements submitted on 23 March 2023); (b) Waka Kotahi (December 2022). Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project – Response to request for additional information pursuant to section 92 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the “Section 92 Response”). (c) McConchie J (2023). Effect of proposed abstraction of construction water from Waitohu Stream. Memorandum...

6. Proactive release - Evidence to inform a regulated cannabis market [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...PR OAC TI VE LY R EL EA SE D BY T HE M IN IS TR Y OF JU ST IC E Authors: Dr Ganesh Nana, Hillmaré Schulze, Amanda Reid, Merewyn Groom, Sam Green, Hugh Dixon, and Nick Roberston All work is done, and services rendered at the request of, and for the purposes of the client only. Neither BERL nor any of its employees accepts any responsibility on any grounds whatsoever, including negligence, to any other person. While every effort is made by BERL to ensure that the i...

7. [2019] NZEnvC 179 Lindis Catchment Group Incorporated v Otago Regional Council [pdf, 4 MB]

   ...While that point often goes without saying it is important to recall the principle here because for Otago Fish and Game Council ("Fish and Game") Ms Baker-Galloway submitted28 : 26 27 28 Granting the resource consents to LCG in the form applied for (i .e. minimum flow of 550 1/s at the Ardgour flow recorder and total primary allocation limit for the Lindis catchment of Attachment 1 to the section 92(1) letter which itself is Attachment 1 to the section 87F Report [Env...

8. 2021-05-24 NPSFM s32 Evaluation [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   .................................................................................. 15 3.3 Scale and significance of the proposal ........................................................................ 17 4.0 EVIDENCE BASE – RESEARCH, CONSULTATION, INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS UNDERTAKEN .......................................................... 20 4.1 Research, information and analysis ............................................................................ 20 5.0 EVALUATION OF THE OBJECT...

9. Regulatory Impact Statement Privacy Act 1993 Information Sharing Amendments [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...standards may be developed with a focus on confidentiality and may provide disincentives for public service providers to share information. There also may be information technology barriers. Further, some agencies may lack the resources to respond to requests for information from other agencies. There is also the concern that sharing information with other agencies may undermine trusting relationships with clients or discourage clients from providing complete and accurate information i...

10. [2011] NZEmpC 45 Bachu v Davie Motors Ltd [pdf, 78 KB]

    ...consists of his original actions in simply abandoning his employment. He did not raise a personal grievance until consulting his solicitors nearly 90 days after leaving. The defendant responded promptly to that. Nearly a month after that Mr Bachu requested mediation. The defendant agreed to attend mediation but Mr Bachu took no steps to ensure mediation took place. Nearly two years then elapsed before Mr Bachu filed an application with the Authority. Even then Mr Bachu failed...