Search Results

1. Pohe - Whangawehi 9B (2005) 108 Wairoa MB 136 (108 WR 136) [pdf, 487 KB]

   ...2004 at 108 Wairoa 20 I told those present in Court that I was of the view that on the information before me the application should be granted. I then stated that a copy of the minutes would be sent to Mr Jim Pohe who had raised some objections and requested a response from him to the Court minutes. 8. Mr Jim Pohe responded by letter dated 1 January 2005 recording his concerns to the partition as follows: (i) The area sought by Joe should be taken from the 2 % acre area gifted by Jim...

2. Hata - Opape 30 (2003) 81 Ōpōtiki MB 201 (81 OPO 201) [pdf, 423 KB]

   ...Received from: Original owner Motu Hata Received from: Original owner Wini Hata (66 SI 252) 7141.1 7141.1 2375.0 1187.5 1187.5 The Block was partitioned on the 2nd day of October 2000 (6 Conference MB 3-5), appellations issued by Land Information NZ on 11 January 2001 as follows: Opape 29 (shown in minute as Opape 3C3A 1) The area of this Block is 10.1000 hectares (equal to 24 acres 3 roods 33.22 perches) Owner is Motu Hata 1.00000 TOTAL SHARE 1.00000 Opape 29 block i...

3. Herepete - Herepete Whanau Trust (2007) 120 Whangarei MB 45 (120 WH 45) [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...hearing in the Northern Advocate. [5] On 31 October 2006 the Court commenced the special hearing. The hearing had been notified in the Northern Advocate as directed. Only Mr Herepete and some o~ his supporters appeared before the Court. The applicant requested an adj(>urnment o£the application to a hearing at Kaitaia, which is much closer to the land iilterests in concern. Accordingly, the application was adjourned for a half day fixture in K~itaia. [6] On 13 June 2007 the fix...

4. Canterbury / Westland Standards Committee 3 v Johnson [2018] NZLCDT 21 [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...poor English and was elderly. Ms D was an unsophisticated trustee. Neither had ever had their trustee duties explained to them. Independent advice was therefore crucial to ensure that the trustees made their decision to purchase (or not) on an informed basis; and The value and significance of the transaction: the trust’s main asset (Mrs H’s unencumbered family home) was being mortgaged to finance the purchase of a house from Mr Ed Johnston. This was not a transaction to be enter...

5. INZ Calder v Ahmed [2019] NZIACDT 35 (23 May 2019) sanctions [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...sought residence in New Zealand. [4] The Tribunal found that Mr Ahmed had permitted his unlicensed staff to give “immigration advice”, as defined in the Act. They had largely been responsible for engaging with the clients in compiling the information and documents necessary to lodge the residence applications for each. The staff were also found to have been responsible for most of the communications with Immigration New Zealand. Mr Ahmed had been involved with the clients...

6. M v I [2018] NZIACDT 17 (18 June 2018) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...sanctions within 10 working days of the issue of this decision. [32] Mr I’s representatives may file a reply within a further 10 working days. [33] Any party may apply to vary the timetable. Publication of the adviser’s name [34] The Registrar is requested to indicate whether, in her view, Mr I’s identity should be published. The Complainant and Mr I’s representatives may of course also take a position on this matter. 9 [35] The name or information that m...

7. N v I [2018] NZIACDT 19 (18 June 2018) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...sanctions within 10 working days of the issue of this decision. [32] Mr I’s representatives may file a reply within a further 10 working days. [33] Any party may apply to vary the timetable. Publication of the adviser’s name [34] The Registrar is requested to indicate whether, in her view, Mr I’s identity should be published. The Complainant and Mr I’s representatives may of course also take a position on this matter. 9 [35] The name or information that m...

8. [2018] NZEnvC 146 Panmure Fish Chips v Auckland Transport [pdf, 4.3 MB]

   ...disagreement continued with the Council over whether or not it held easement rights over 13-17 Queens Road to the rear of 21 Queens Road. [22] Quite simply, there does not appear to be any evidence to support the view that there was an easement of any form to the rear of 21 Queens Road premises via 13, 15 and 17 Queens Road. More importantly, practical access does not appear to have been ( ( 6 restricted to the rear of those properties at any time before the lease expiry dat...

9. Evidence Brief: Faith-based Interventions [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...adoption of religious beliefs and commitments, and by encouraging long-term involvement in a faith community. In 2014, about one in five New Zealand prisoners reported a religious affiliation. Among these, well over two thirds specified some form of Christianity (including Ratana (10%) and Mormonism (7%)). The largest non-Christian religions were Islam (4%), Buddhism (2%) and Hinduism (1%). Certain religious inputs are legally required for prisons in New Zealand. The manif...

10. 2021-02-22 Special Advisor (Ian Gordon) - submission on Willowridge s 281 application [pdf, 150 KB]

    ...Environment under s 142(2)(b) that the matter be referred to the Court. 4. Willowridge Development Ltd (Willowridge) has filed a s 274 Notice dated 17 December 2020 (Notice). The Notice was out of time by some three weeks and was accompanied by a request for waiver of time under s 281 of the RMA. 5. In its Notice and subsequent memoranda, Willowridge states: a. it applies under s 274(1)(d); b. it is not a trade competitor for the purpose of s 308A; c. its proposed joinder is...