Search Results

1. Richard Maxwell Family Trust v Lianne Maxwell Family Trust - Lot 1 Paeroa East X (2016) 141 Waiariki MB 53 (141 WAR 53) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...from Māori freehold land to General land. The Court adjourned the matter to allow the applicants’ time to comply with the statutory requirements for such an application. [12] The application was subsequently withdrawn at the applicant’s request. 5 Procedural History [13] Following receipt of the application the matter was set down to be heard before me on 6 May 2016. At the conclusion of that hearing I adjourned the matter to Chambers for a written decision to issue....

2. [2017] NZEmpC 144 CE of Social Development v Tuilaepa [pdf, 482 KB]

   ...[4] On 1 September 2015 Mr Tuilaepa became involved in a violent scuffle with a young person. That scuffle occurred in the time-out room at the facility where the young person had been sent following his failure, or refusal, to respond to requests made of him by another residential social worker. [5] Mr Tuilaepa prevented the young person from leaving the time-out room. The young person was pushed with sufficient force to move him into the middle of the time-out room. A seco...

3. BORA Marine Protection Legislation Bill [pdf, 313 KB]

   ...the offence. Similarly, new s 33O authorises the Director of Maritime New Zealand to require a person who operates, maintains or services a port facility to provide any information he or she considers relevant to an inspection or audit. 10. A request for information or documents constitutes a search for the purposes of s 21 of the Bill of Rights Act. These sections may also engage s 14 of the Bill of Rights Act, which protects the right to freedom of expression, including the freedo...

4. Murphy - Estate of Lizzie Turner Tau [2013] Chief Judge's MB 48 (2013 CJ 48) [pdf, 564 KB]

   ...of the facts of the case to the Court or the Registrar. The Chief Judge may also make such other orders as, in the opinion of the Chief Judge, is necessary in the interests of justice to remedy the mistake or omIssIon. [12] The applicant has requested that the Chief Judge amend the order that is the subject of this application. The burden of proof is on the applicant to prove the existence of the alleged mistake or omission either by the Court or in the presentation of evidence....

5. BORA Maritime Powers Extension Bill [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...smuggling evidence or a relevant document on or about their body; ii. for electronic devices, while an initial search requires a reasonable suspicion of relevant offending, “full searches” can only be undertaken where a Customs official has formed a reasonable belief of offending occurring, which attract the same safeguards as equivalent searches occurring in the border context; and e. the powers are subject to Part 4 (except subpart 3) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012,14...

6. BORA Building Amendment Bill [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...Rights Act, particularly s 14 (freedom of expression), s 18 (freedom of movement), and s 21 (right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure). These rights and freedoms are limited as the Bill provides powers to compel the provision of information, restrict access to buildings, and enter and inspect buildings and land, in order to protect people from risks to their life and safety. 5. We conclude that the Bill is consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the Bill of...

7. MVDT Annual Report 2013-2014 [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...the car was flat because there were cracks and bends from heavy impact on the inner rim section on one of the wheels and he had to pay to have the wheel welded. When the purchaser asked the trader’s director for a refund of his purchase price his request was ignored. He had his solicitors write to the trader rejecting the vehicle and filed an application with the Tribunal. The trader did not appear at the hearing. The Tribunal received a report from a Mercedes-Benz repairer who es...

8. Kupa v Kupa - Lot 10H and 101 Pt Omahu 2C1C (2020) 85 Takitimu MB 189 (85 TKT 189) [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...cross-examination, there is nothing before the Court to confirm that the gift was temporary and that it was always intended the shares would be returned by Mr Kupa Senior and Willem Kupa to Mr Kupa. [22] In any event, I do not see how the alleged request made by Mr Kupa (Senior) is fair or reasonable in the circumstances. It would be unfortunate if the claims made by Willem Kupa are correct, that Mr Kupa (Senior) now seeks to in effect barter with his son over what had intended t...

9. [2020] NZEnvC 191 Aratiatia Livestock Limited v Southland Regional Council [pdf, 413 KB]

   ...planning instruments to which this Regional Plan would give effect when proposing amendments to the same. It was, therefore, possible that we may have overlooked or not properly understood a relevant provision. Given this, it was prudent that a formal report be prepared by the Regional Council in response to the now settled objectives. [3] While the court has released decisions on certain policies, these have yet to be confirmed pending a s 32AA report on the same. The Regional Coun...

10. 2021-04-14 Beef + Lamb - ORC PC7 - Opening submissions [pdf, 194 KB]

    ...Island for B+LNZ. 3. B+LNZ is an industry-good body funded under the Commodity Levies Act through a levy paid by producers on all cattle and sheep slaughtered in New Zealand. Its mission is to deliver innovative tools and services to support informed decision making and continuous improvement in market access, product positioning, and farming systems. 4. DINZ is a levy funded industry-good body established by the Deer Industry New Zealand Regulations (2004) under the Primary Prod...