Search Results

1. Kingi Te Kaha 67B (2007) 98 Opotiki MB 133 (98 OPO 133) [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...ME 110) Objections [10] At the hearing representatives of the owners of the previous Te Kaha 67 Block were present. Mr Waititi, for example appeared for the Ngawhira Apanui Waititi Whanau TlUst. The TlUst was once an owner in the land when it formed part of the Te Kaha 67 block. Mr Waititi and other tlUstees and beneficiaries of this TlUst are members of the preferred classes of alienees to whom the applicant must provide a right of first refusal if he wishes to sell the land as M...

2. [2017] NZEmpC 114 Quality Consumables Ltd v Hannah [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...evidence from Mr McCormick. The affirmation in reply [11] In an affirmation in reply dated 14 August 2017, Mr McCormick attempts to rectify the serious deficiencies in his earlier affidavit in support, which failed to provide sufficient information to the Court. In his later affirmation he disputes the assertions made by Ms Hannah as to the way he treated her and creditors of the company. He remains of a view that Ms Hannah’s difficult financial position, which she confirms...

3. Complaints Assessment Committee 408 v Colin Boyer [2017] NZREADT 43 [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...properties. The Investigator asked Mr Cloete the process if he was interested in going further. Mr Cloete indicated that he would email the agreement for sale and purchase, negotiations could occur by email and that the Investigator’s lawyer should request the LIM report. Mr Cloete also stated that he is not a real estate agent but he is the principal of Century 21 and the Investigator could still deal directly with him throughout the process as he would just get an agent to si...

4. [2019] NZEmpC 18 Watts & Hughes Construction Ltd v De Buyzer [pdf, 315 KB]

   ...involved in placing Mr de Buyzer with WHCL. WHCL concluded that Mr de Buyzer’s evidence before the Authority had been incorrect. It then instituted the challenge. It says that at the hearing of the challenge, it will provide the additional information which it has now obtained. [26] In response, it is asserted for Mr de Buyzer that the so-called fresh evidence should have been provided to the Authority. Applicable principles [27] Rule 15.1 of the High Court Rules 2016 app...

5. INZ (Foley) v Niland [2019] NZIACDT 16 (19 March 2019) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...was therefore inevitable that those employees would have assisted and advised the clients as to the specific information and documents required by Immigration New Zealand. The staff of IPS had interviewed the clients, completed the application forms, compiled the supporting documents, lodged the applications with Immigration New Zealand and communicated with the clients. It was acknowledged that Ms Niland did undertake much of the communication with Immigration New Zealand. [6...

6. CAB An Anti-Corruption Work Programme for New Zealand [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...issue a press release announcing the launch of the Anti-Corruption Work Programme. I also intend to publish this paper and related Cabinet decisions online, subject to consideration of any redactions that would be justified if the information had been requested under the Official Information Act 1982. Recommendations 41 The Minister of Justice recommends that the Committee: 1 note that the Serious Fraud Office, in consultation with relevant agencies, has designed an Anti-Corruption W...

7. Justice Matters - Issue 11 - June 2018 [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...I remain committed to the Ministry of Justice and the sector and will continue to work hard to deliver people- centred justice services for New Zealanders into 2019. We have an ambitious and exciting work programme - safe and effective justice reforms, the new Crown/ Māori Relations portfolio, courts modernisation and the huge amount of work happening to ensure that we make the Ministry a great place to be. Having said that, we do need to be mindful that change is coming and to be pr...

8. Taueki - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) (2018) 386 Aotea MB 142 (386 AOT 142) [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...instruction. The Applicant’s approach to file proceedings against the Lake Trust’s private contractors is nothing more than a cynical attempt to undermine the Lake Trust’s ability to have essential works undertaken on our land in the future. We request that the Court remove Tatana Contracting Limited and Horowhenua Security from these proceedings. There is no injunction to be heard. All equipment, machinery and security fencing has been removed. All activity has ceased a...

9. Committee of Management of Mangatawa Papamoa Blocks Incorporation - Lot 1 DPS 65413 (2018) 164 Waikato Maniapoto MB 69 (164 WMN 69) [pdf, 305 KB]

   ...potential tenant. I understand from the evidence that is before me that Mainfreight representatives in fact attended the second hearing on 26 January 2019. [9] At the date of the release of the reserved decision, negotiations were ongoing. Although a formal lease offer had been made, it was not yet concluded. It was expected that Mainfreight would lease six of the lots, as proposed to be created, pursuant to the reserved decision. [10] By 9 March 2018 negotiations had reached the...

10. Martin Trusts TRI-2017-100-006 Procedural Order 9 [pdf, 256 KB]

    ...The High Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider its “standing back” assessment, taking into account the claimants’ and the first and third respondents’ respective relevant interests. [64] In conducting the standing back exercise which forms a key part of the removal application jurisdiction, I am exercising a discretion. In so doing, I have considered the interests of both the claimants and the respondents. [65] I have reached the conclusion that the first and third...