Search Results

1. Nicholls v Nicholls - Estate of Wiremu Uru Nicholls (2002) 104 Hauraki MB 82 (104 H 82) [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...sought in the application. It does not serve to vest the lands in the beneficiaries. Applications will be needed for that purpose and no doubt some of the beneficiaries will wish their entitlements to be vested in whanau trusts which they have formed. The Maori land interests of the deceased have been searched and a list is set out hereunder so that this information may be carried forward onto any further application under section 100(2)(e). List of Maori Land Interests of Billy N...

2. Complaints Assessment Committee 408 v Nicholas Schembri, Joseph Lupi & Timothy Kearins [2017] NZREADT 56 [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...fined $1,000. In De Heer, a newly qualified salesperson was similarly found to have breached s 36(2A) of the LCA, rr 5.1 and 5.2 of the Rules, but also found to have breached rr 6.2 (duty to act in good faith) and 6.4 (licensee must not withhold information that should be provided to client) in failing to present offers to a vendor. Counsel noted that the CAC had accepted that Mr Schembri’s conduct was less serious than the licensee in De Heer.

3. [2019] NZEnvC 046 Upper Clutha Environmental Defence Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...Mr Haworth's evidence on this occasion. Rather, my approach to that task should be to consider the substance of the evidence before me according to relevant legal principles as to admissibility. [11] Dr Cossens notes that Mr Haworth's formal qualifications are in accountancy and that he is not a member of relevant professional organisations for landscape architects or planning experts. UCESI's submissions opposing the application [12] UCESI responds to Dr Cossens&#0...

4. National Register of Maori Incorporations 2018 [xls, 66 KB]

   ...URI: http://www.maorilandcourt.govt.nz/your-maori-land/maori-land-data-service/ Disclaimer: http://www.maorilandonline.govt.nz/gis/disclaimer.htm Release Notes: The information contained in this spreadsheet is a snapshot of data from the Māori Land Information System of the Māori Land Court, New Zealand This data forms part of the public permenant record of the Court as described in rule 7.19 of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 and it has been released publically under the authority of...

5. Family Court Rewrite Submission FV Death Review Committee [pdf, 316 KB]

   1 Family Violence Death Review Committee (FVDRC) Submission on Strengthening the Family Justice System To: The Independent Panel Family Court Review FamilyJusticeReforms@justice.govt.nz From: Family Violence Death Review Committee Contact: Holly Mansfield Specialist, Family Violence Death Review Committee Email: Health Quality & Safety Commission March 2019 s 9(2)(a) s 9(2)(a) 2 1. Mortality Review Committees The Family Violen...

6. Luke v Nganeko - Ngātituhekerangi 23A and 22B (2018) 394 Aotea MB 141 (394 AOT 141) [pdf, 342 KB]

   ...compliance with the rule having regard for its purpose, the consequences of non-compliance of a party or any person affected by it in the fairness of requiring compliance or otherwise. [25] As is often the case in proceedings of this nature, a request for an adjournment to consider steps to be taken to obtain an offer from the preferred class of alienees emerges after the closing date has passed.9 That said, the authorities underscore the necessity of providing a reasonable timefra...

7. [2021] NZEnvC 012 Davis v Gisborne District Council [pdf, 709 KB]

   ...residences were established in the vicinity of the site.3 The Council started to receive complaints from residents regarding noise from the site, and the Council invited and received a letter in 2012 from the I<auri Park Residents Association requesting the Council review the consent.4 [3] The Council notified the Club of its intention to review the consent in February 2014.5 The Club began looking for alternative sites, and the Council put the 1 Davis v Gisbome District Council...

8. [2021] NZACC 30 - Knox v ACC (5 February 2021) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...deemed accident date of 24 December 2015 (the date when Mr Knox presented to Dunedin Hospital for treatment for the septic arthritis). [4] Mr Knox sought weekly compensation from 25 December 2015 for 42 days, as recorded in the injury claim form dated 18 January 2016. [5] The Corporation investigated whether Mr Knox was entitled to weekly compensation. [6] On 19 January 2016, MPI replied to the Corporation’s questions as to Mr Knox’s work patterns, stating that: •...

9. [2021] NZIACDT 3 - DY v Parker (25 February 2021) [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...any fault in the draft business plan or the application compiled. A refund of the fee paid is not therefore justified. [55] The complainant seeks $2,000 for distress, said to arise from delays in providing to the complainant his file when requested. There is no evidence from the complainant as to any distress, but in any event, it would not arise from the wrongdoing upheld by the Tribunal. I decline to award compensation for any such distress. 12 OUTCOME [56] Mr Park...

10. Greaterex v Preston [pdf, 41 KB]

    ...credit the settlement sum received from the other respondents of $205,000.00. [4] Mr Tim Preston filed a preliminary response to the claim dated 10 March 2009 but chose not to attend the hearing. In his absence the hearing was essentially a formal proof process akin to that followed by the High Court in Body Corporate 191608 v Jontaeshyan Investments Limited & Ors (unreported) [19 February 2009] HC ,Auckland, CIV 2008-404-002358, Asher J. The claimants thus proceed on...