LCRO 76/2018 HS v WA (19 February 2019) [pdf, 175 KB]
...10 Schedule A. The $50,000 is referred to Mr EC’s file note of the meeting Ms M and Mr HS attended in May 2013. The only uncertainties could have been as to the status of the bank account and its contents, and the $50,000. Even if Mr WA had requested full disclosure from Ms M, the $50,000 would only have appeared if she accepted it was her separate property or their relationship property. As it was omitted from Schedule A, as previously mentioned, it is assumed that Ms M’s p...