Search Results

1. MOJ0217.6E_OCT21_WEB.pdf [pdf, 337 KB]

   APPLICATIONS Te Kooti Whenua Māori – Māori Land Court For more information, go to maorilandcourt.govt.nz Te Kooti Whenua Māori – Māori Land Court (MLC) is the New Zealand Court that hears matters relating to Māori land. The unique relationship between Māori and whenua is recognised by the MLC, and the records held by the Court form an invaluable part of the whakapapa of all Māori people. The MLC operates under the provisions of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (‘the Act’)....

2. ND v KQ [2024] NZDT 631 (24 September 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...the bottom of the candle shape and are not of the quality she requires or expected. 2. ND wishes to return the candles and claims compensation of $127.00. 3. KQ stands by the quality of the candles saying they are produced in beeswax and are formed within a mold. KQ says she has offered to exchange the candles, but this is not what ND wants. 4. The Issues to be resolved are: a. Were the candles of acceptable quality? b. If not, has KQ complied with her obligations under the...

3. IH v QM [2024] NZDT 389 (5 June 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 389 APPLICANT IH RESPONDENT QM The Tribunal orders: QM is to pay IH the sum of $11,948.00 on or before 26 June 2024. Reasons: 1. QM listed a [car] on [platform] for $1.00 reserve. 2. IH bid on the auction. Shortly before the auction ended the two highest bids were removed, leaving IH the winner of the auction. 3. IH was concerned about the late removal of the two highest bids and ask...

4. NT & BT v HM [2024] NZDT 694 (20 September 2024) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...stated “[the horse] is a quality horse with loads of talent. He has competed in Showjumping to 1.15m, Level 1 Dressage and local pc events all with success…”. They considered this meant there was a high likelihood he could return to this kind of form. 2. However, NT and BT say that they have tried all means possible for [the horse] to achieve that potential and contend that HM misrepresented [the horse]’s previous level of success to them. They initially claimed a refund of $...

5. Previous consultations

   ...analysing what people told us, or where we’ve published results or decisions have been made. Recent closed consultations include: [2021] Justice Sector Long-term Insights Briefing [2021] Draft CERD Report: Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination [2021] Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing Act 2009 [2021] Incitement of Hatred and Discrimination in Aotearoa New Zealand [2021]Review of adoption laws in Aotearoa New Zealand [2021]National...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Have your say

6. TN & UX v N Ltd [2025] NZDT 81 (2 April 2025) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...money had been stolen. N Ltd advised TN and UX in a meeting on 7 November 2025 that their wedding would not be able to be hosted by it, unless they paid their deposit again. The applicants were accused of somehow having facilitated the burglary and informed by N Ltd that they would not get a refund of their deposit. The procedural background to this order 2. Today was the second hearing in this matter, scheduled by way of telephone conference. The first hearing, also a telephone co...

7. D Ltd v M Ltd [2025] NZDT 146 (12 May 2025) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...the installation of a new sensor and sent M Ltd an invoice. M Ltd replied that this work was not authorised, and it did not accept responsibility for paying the invoice. 8. The issues which the Tribunal must resolve are: a. Was there a contract formed between M Ltd and D Ltd entitling D Ltd to payment? b. If yes, was the scope of that contract limited to investigating and advising why the alarm was not triggered by the break in or was additional work, to install a new sensor in a dif...

8. Form 55 Notice of application for final charging order 2016 [docx, 24 KB]

   This editable form has been updated to reflect the new District Court Act 2016 Form 55 Notice of application for final charging order [bookmark: DLM6124023]Complete and insert the heading as set out in form 49. To the Registrar of the District Court at Choose an item. and [bookmark: _GoBack]To [name of other party to be served] This document notifies you that— 1 The judgment creditor/duly authorised agent of the judgment creditor* will apply to the District Court at [place], [date, time t...

9. [2013] NZEmpC 32 Piefection Foods Ltd v Hume [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...to provide, and it failed deliberately to attend the investigation meeting. Although it did provide written comments to the Authority prior to the investigation meeting in a number of emails, no substantial supporting evidence in documentary form was supplied, and no sworn evidence was submitted. [5] Piefection Foods Limited, through its director, Mr Andrew McEwan, did not act in good faith towards Mr Ian Hume. It refused to communicate with Mr Hume's representative, re...

10. MacFarlane v Hurihanganui - Whakarewarewa 2B (2015) 133 Waiariki MB 290 (133 WAR 290) [pdf, 262 KB]

    ...or before 11 September 2015 but were not submitted in time. It is noted that 9 of these owners had Rotorua addresses and would have had sufficient time to present these proxies to the Court; and (c) 9 of these 24 were also invalid due to the forms being incorrectly completed. [14] The second notice of the meeting sent to owners had the following statement: “POSTAL votes and PROXY forms must be received by the Court by 4pm Friday 11 September 2015,...” [15] The proxy for...