Search Results

1. OIA-97016.pdf [pdf, 213 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz Our ref: OIA 97016 11 July 2022 Official Information Act 1982 request: Nelson District Court Thank you for your follow up email of 23 June 2022, in which you requested further information about the Nelson District Court under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act). Your new questions and my responses are below. On 4 July 2022 you were...

2. OIA-118690.pdf [pdf, 715 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 31 January 2025 Ref: OIA 118690 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Government targets I refer to your email of 3 December 2024 to the Prime Minister, Rt Hon Christopher Luxon, requesting information, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), relating to the nine Government targets. Specifically, you requested:...

3. [2014] NZEmpC 201 Dunn v Waitemata DHB [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...its mode of delivery or its timing. The letter was a focus of complaint by the plaintiff at hearing. I return to it later. [10] The plaintiff responded to the WDHB’s earlier letter of 5 May on 26 June 2008. The medical report that had been requested was not provided. A request was made for the WDHB’s Return to Work and Rehabilitation policy. This was provided by the WDHB by way of correspondence the same day. [11] The WDHB had sought a report from a specialist occupational...

4. Nimick & Anor v CAC 20005 & Ors [2014] NZREADT 11 [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...exclusive and sole agency authority, this agency appointment shall continue on general authority terms”. [3] The complainants signed an “Extension Of Listing Authority” document on 28 November 2012. That document was a standard Harcourts’ form which was signed by the parties on 28 November 2012 and extends the expiry date of the original agency to 28 February 2013 but, otherwise, all other terms and conditions of the original listing authority remained unchanged. It follows th...

5. CA v DO LCRO 68 / 2012 (26 September 2013) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...this review. Background [5] In November 2009 CA was approached by a neighbour and friend of the complainant’s mother, DP. I will refer to DO, the complainant, as ‘the Complainant’. 2 [6] DP’s neighbour and friend, on her behalf, requested CA to assist DP in resisting the intention of her family to move her into a rest home. The approach to CA was made on Wednesday 25 November 2009, and the family’s stated intention was to relocate DP on the following Monday. [...

6. ENV-2016-AKL-000203 Frizzell v Auckland Council [pdf, 5.6 MB]

   ...Panel recommendations), or section 156(3) of the LGATPA (appeals by unduly prejudiced persons against Auckland Council decisions accepting Hearings Panel recommendatIons identified by Panel as 'out of scope') . 2. This template Is based on Form 6 In the Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Procedure for Auckland CombIned Plan) Regulations 2013, but has been amended In a number of respects - e.g. to reflect certain waivers / directions made by the Environment Court. 3. For des...

7. Alasdair Morrison (dated 2 June 2017) [pdf, 3.9 MB]

   ...speaking in opposition to the proposed wind project on Porteous Hill. 3. I am a member of the Blueskin Amenity and Landscape Society Inc. (BALS) and I remain strongly opposed to the proposed wind turbine project. 4. I am not opposed to various forms of ‘alternative energy’, be it wind power, solar power, wave power, or any other form, but I am very much opposed to the proposal to erect a 110 metre high wind turbine on top of Porteous Hill above Warrington. 5. I am a former Merc...

8. LCRO 109/2020 SV v FT (28 January 2021) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...FT was to pay costs to the New Zealand Law Society in the sum of $500 and pay compensation to Mr SV in the sum of $1,250. Application for review [22] Mr SV filed an application for review on 10 June 2020. [23] His application is confined to requesting a review of the Committee’s compensation order. [24] He submits that the Committee should have reimbursed him the full sum of the legal costs he had incurred in opposing the caveat. [25] Mr FT was invited to provide response...

9. LCRO 20/2016 LC and CM v JP (19 March 2019) [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...signed (the agreement). The agreement required the applicants to pay the 10 per cent deposit immediately on completion of the auction. The vendor’s agent was from [AH] (the agent). [3] Mr JP received paperwork from the agent which included a form dated 26 March 2015 for the applicants to sign, authorising the agent to release the deposit 2 from its trust account before the statutory 10 day period had passed (the authority).1 Although the authority was signed and stamped a...

10. [2018] NZSSAA 44 (14 September 2018) [pdf, 261 KB]

    ...the appellant’s SLP/carer. The appellant considers that it is suspended. He said he asked the Ministry to suspend his SLP/carer pending the outcome of this appeal. However, the Ministry says it cancelled it because he did not complete the form confirming his circumstances. [13] At the second hearing, Ms Siueva agreed to review the circumstances surrounding the suspension/cancellation of the appellant’s SLP and, if the appellant’s entitlement to SLP had not changed, reinstat...