Search Results

1. Pacey v Adlam - Matata Parish 39A 2B 2B 2A (2017) 178 Waiariki MB 32 (178 WAR 32) [pdf, 365 KB]

   ...voting, Ms Savage argued that more explanation should have been given about the process, particularly as there were a number of proxies that were ruled invalid. She advised that she had also expected there would be an opportunity to amend the proxy forms at the meeting. She submitted that as such the invalid proxy votes should be reinstated. [11] Ms Savage submitted that the confusion mainly resulted from the fact that the elections for both trusts were run together. She argued...

2. Midlane v Woodberg [2013] NZIACDT 31 (27 May 2013) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...point of contact in New Zealand, which was the company he had engaged. [17] The importance of this instruction was made clear to Ms Anderson. [18] Ms Anderson advised on the appropriate investor category under which Mr A should apply and the information required to prepare and lodge an “Expression of Interest” form. Mr Midlane explained there may be some delay due to Mr A’s commitments. Ms Anderson said the Expression of Interest could be lodged with copies of the relevant documen...

3. ENV-2016-AKL-000xxx Howick Ratepayers and Residents Association Incorporated & Others v Auckland Council [pdf, 5.5 MB]

   ...15.9.16 Environment Court Appeal JMS Page 3 (d) There has been no analysis of the need to rezone the land, or any consideration given to the special characteristics the land possesses. (e) The Council's decision is based on incomplete information. In particular the decision-makers did not consider or have access to: i. The Appellants submissions on the Proposed Plan. ii. The evidence available to the Hearings Panel. (f) The Report to Council dated 19 August 2016 prepared by...

4. [2020] NZREADT 51 - [Appellant] v Real Estate Agents Authority (21 October 2020) [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...was also signed by Ms Foster. They then left the Agency and walked the short distance to the property. [7] About 30 minutes later, they were working in the garden at the property when Ms Foster visited them. She said they had signed the wrong form. She had a two- page document with her, which she said had the same information on it, and asked them to sign it. This document was headed “Renewal of Real Estate Agency Agreement” (“the renewal agreement”). It had the names...

5. AF v X Standards Committee LCRO 84/2014 [pdf, 279 KB]

   ...BETWEEN AF Applicant AND X STANDARDS COMMITTEE Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Ms AF seeks to review the X Standards Committee’s request for her to produce files and documents, those documents sought by the Committee in order to assist with pursuing enquiry into a complaint made against Ms AF by Mr Z. Background [2] In 2009, Mr Z instructed a [town] law firm to act...

6. July 2016 Criminal Fee Schedules [pdf, 684 KB]

   ...verdict Schedules A–J — July 2016 7  excludes waiting time where the Judge has excused counsel. If more than one hour’s waiting time is claimed per activity (eg waiting time for trial or waiting time for sentencing) the following information is required:  a summary of both the waiting time and hearing time on the day of appearance – date and times  an explanation of the circumstances is also required. This must include: - confirmation that the provider was un...

7. [2022] NZACC 88 – Pol v ACC (12 May 2022) [pdf, 284 KB]

   ...an email to the Corporation, attaching a letter from Mr Pol, dated 25 May 2020. The letter was addressed to the chief executive officer (“CEO”) of the Corporation and listed various complaints about the management of his claim as well as a request for an “out of scope payment” to compensate Mr Pol for the suspension of his weekly compensation in September 2019, over and above the payment of backdated weekly compensation and interest which he had already received. [31] On...

8. OIA-98262.pdf [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 contactus@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 16 September 2022 Our ref: OIA 98262 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Nature of democracy and the evolution of democracy Thank you for your email of 10 August 2022 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information related to the nature of democracy. Specifically, you requested: “…...

9. List-of-Fee-Changes-1-July-2025.pdf [pdf, 519 KB]

   ...(inc GST) New rate (inc GST) Leave to appeal $1,430 $1,482 Interlocutory application $520 $539 Judgment for Sealing $65 $67 Search and Inspect Formal Court Record (second figure for subsequent names) $39.00 | $7.00 $40.00 | $7.00 Requesting access to a document or formal court record or file relating to a criminal appeal $33 $34 Requesting access to a document under rule 7 of the Court of Appeal (Access to Court Documents) Rules 2009 or applying under rule 12 of tho...

10. OIA-Policy Work Programme [pdf, 2.6 MB]

    Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 12 November 2024 Ref: OIA 116278 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Policy work programme Thank you for your email of 27 September 2024 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry). You have requested, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act) information relating to the Ministry’s policy work programme. Specifically, you re...