Search Results

1. Jonas v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 412) and Hartnett [2019] NZREADT 002 [pdf, 326 KB]

   ...obligations of the licensee were in the present case which involved possible GST liability, it is necessary to begin with a brief discussion of the effect of GST provisions in this type of transaction. Schedule 2 of the ASP was inserted into the standard form agreement for a purpose. [8] The sale of land is deemed to be a supply of goods within the scope of the Goods and Services Tax Act 1985 (the Act).7 However, where the land supplied is part of the sale of a taxable activity wh...

2. LCRO 34/2020 KL v OP (4 August 2020) [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...address. [28] Mr KL has failed to identify any such professional standards issue arising from Mr OP’ conduct. [29] There is no proper basis on which to make a direction pursuant to s 201 of the Act. [30] As an aside, although Mr KL’s request for a direction pursuant to s 201 is declined, that would not prevent any of the trustees from engaging in mediation privately or in the course of the High Court process to which Mr OP is now understood to be a party, if they so wishe...

3. Shihaku v Mizoguchi [2019] NZIACDT 24 (24 April 2019) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...did sign the agreement. [8] As the complainant was not satisfied with the progress of Mr Mizoguchi’s work, he requested on 5 May 2015 that the services be cancelled. Mr Mizoguchi returned the complainant’s documents and provided a refund form to him. [9] On 8 June 2015, the complainant requested a refund in euros, but did not give the information needed to make the transfer until 9 July 2015. Mr Mizoguchi refunded Immigration New Zealand’s fee on 23 July 2015, after an u...

4. [2019] NZEnvC 127 Taylor v Selwyn District Council [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   ...Day plan "Departure and Arrival Vectors - Residential Flight Paths"; (iii) plan titled "Proposed Bund"; and (iv) photograph marked "Photograph A" Taylor v Selwyn DC Determination July 2019 2 - attached to and forming part of this determination (2) the appeal is otherwise dismissed. B: Under s285 of the Resource Management Act 1991 , there is no order as to costs. REASONS Introduction [1] This proceeding concerns an appeal against a decision...

5. Judicial Appointments Protocol Nov 2019 [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...according to the law, and which will be aware of, and sensitive to, the broad dimensions of our society. Recognising the importance of this task and the public interest in the appointments processes, the procedures for judicial appointments have been formalised. The guiding principles for the procedures are as follows: (i) Clear and publicly identified processes for selection and appointment; (ii) Clear and publicly identified criteria against which persons considered are assessed;...

6. D Ltd v QT Ltd [2021] NZDT 1468 (21 January 2021) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...denies telling Mr N that there is no need for him to get his own asbestos report or that he had the report and would give Mr N a copy. He said that he did not get a copy of the report until 12 September, when QT Ltd forwarded to him (on Mr O’s request) the copy that NQ had emailed to QT Ltd at 12.42pm on 11 September 2017. He denied knowing that it was limited test and report and not sufficient for demolition purposes. 17. I prefer Mr O’s evidence in this regard over the eviden...

7. [2022] NZACC 106 - Easthope v ACC (2 June 2022) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...____________________________________________________________________ [1] This appeal was brought by the appellant against a decision by the respondent dated 3 August 2020 in which it declined funding for a neck brace. [2] On 19 May 2021, the Corporation revoked its decision and approved funding for the requested neck brace. [3] The Corporation’s position therefore is that the appeal is now moot and there are no substantive issues to be determined. ACR 13/12 [4] The appel...

8. [2022] NZIACDT 8 - IF v Registrar (2 May 2022) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...appellant and his wife that day informing them of this and asking her to stop working immediately if she was doing so. He stated that a s 61 application would have to be filed as soon as possible.1 [12] On 1 July 2021, the adviser filed a s 61 request. In his letter of explanation to Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ), the adviser admitted his error. [13] By this stage, the appellant was in direct communication with Immigration NZ. A visa officer informed him on 2 July 2...

9. Judicial-Appointments-Protocol-HC-February-2025 [docx, 86 KB]

   ...according to the law, and which will be aware of, and sensitive to, the broad dimensions of our society. Recognising the importance of this task and the public interest in the appointments processes, the procedures for judicial appointments have been formalised. The guiding principles for the procedures are as follows: Clear and publicly identified processes for selection and appointment; Clear and publicly identified criteria against which persons considered are assessed; Clear and publicly...

10. Wild v Ministry for Primary Industries (Strike Out) [2024] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 239 KB]

    ...Privacy Commissioner’s investigation of Ms Wild’s complaint regarding her information privacy request of 22 March 2020 was limited to IPP 6. There is no evidence that suggests the Commissioner’s investigation included the subsequent privacy requests by Ms Wild to MPI, which were made from December 2020.11 The Privacy Commissioner’s Certificate of Investigation is dated 23 December 2020 and thus it is improbable that Ms Wild’s subsequent requests were included within that...