Search Results

1. [2024] NZEnvC 035 Beachlands South Limited Partnership v Auckland Council [pdf, 608 KB]

   ...is a “relatively confined plan change and has three components…”.4 [10] Later the IHP discussed Topic 003 – Well-Functioning Urban Environments as relating to the following provisions: • B2.1 Issues; • B2.2 Urban Growth and Form; • B2.3 A quality built environment; • B2.4 Residential growth; • B2.5 Commercial and industrial growth; • B2.7 Open space and recreation facilities; • B2.8 Social facilities; and • B2.9 Explanation and princip...

2. [2011] NZEmpC 157 Heritage Expeditions Ltd v Fraser [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...well have been suggested as an option or even seen as the best option, it is inherently unlikely that detailed management issues such as terms and conditions of employment would have been discussed at such a meeting. The company had yet to be formed, it was unknown when the company might be incorporated and there was no evidence that even the name had been decided at the time of the meeting on 5 September 2005. [56] Mr Russ’ evidence on this issue was entirely inconsistent with t...

3. Apatu v Trustees of Owhaoko C Trust - Owhaoko C 1 and C 2 [2010] 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 34 (2010 APPEAL 34) [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...Huata-Kupa. [22] Between 4 December 2007 and 14 July 2008, the appellant embarked upon a campaign of writing to the trustees seeking information and certain trust documents. On 20 February 2008 the trustees wrote to Mr Apatu responding to the requests that he had made. It is noted that certain documents and information Mr Apatu requested were not supplied. [23] Mr Apatu continued to write to the trustees between February 2008 and July 2008. In his 14 July 2008 letter Mr Apatu m...

4. Pacey v Adlam - Matata Parish 39A 2B 2B 2A (2017) 178 Waiariki MB 32 (178 WAR 32) [pdf, 365 KB]

   ...voting, Ms Savage argued that more explanation should have been given about the process, particularly as there were a number of proxies that were ruled invalid. She advised that she had also expected there would be an opportunity to amend the proxy forms at the meeting. She submitted that as such the invalid proxy votes should be reinstated. [11] Ms Savage submitted that the confusion mainly resulted from the fact that the elections for both trusts were run together. She argued...

5. Midlane v Woodberg [2013] NZIACDT 31 (27 May 2013) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...point of contact in New Zealand, which was the company he had engaged. [17] The importance of this instruction was made clear to Ms Anderson. [18] Ms Anderson advised on the appropriate investor category under which Mr A should apply and the information required to prepare and lodge an “Expression of Interest” form. Mr Midlane explained there may be some delay due to Mr A’s commitments. Ms Anderson said the Expression of Interest could be lodged with copies of the relevant documen...

6. ENV-2016-AKL-000xxx Howick Ratepayers and Residents Association Incorporated & Others v Auckland Council [pdf, 5.5 MB]

   ...15.9.16 Environment Court Appeal JMS Page 3 (d) There has been no analysis of the need to rezone the land, or any consideration given to the special characteristics the land possesses. (e) The Council's decision is based on incomplete information. In particular the decision-makers did not consider or have access to: i. The Appellants submissions on the Proposed Plan. ii. The evidence available to the Hearings Panel. (f) The Report to Council dated 19 August 2016 prepared by...

7. [2020] NZREADT 51 - [Appellant] v Real Estate Agents Authority (21 October 2020) [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...was also signed by Ms Foster. They then left the Agency and walked the short distance to the property. [7] About 30 minutes later, they were working in the garden at the property when Ms Foster visited them. She said they had signed the wrong form. She had a two- page document with her, which she said had the same information on it, and asked them to sign it. This document was headed “Renewal of Real Estate Agency Agreement” (“the renewal agreement”). It had the names...

8. AF v X Standards Committee LCRO 84/2014 [pdf, 279 KB]

   ...BETWEEN AF Applicant AND X STANDARDS COMMITTEE Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Ms AF seeks to review the X Standards Committee’s request for her to produce files and documents, those documents sought by the Committee in order to assist with pursuing enquiry into a complaint made against Ms AF by Mr Z. Background [2] In 2009, Mr Z instructed a [town] law firm to act...

9. July 2016 Criminal Fee Schedules [pdf, 684 KB]

   ...verdict Schedules A–J — July 2016 7  excludes waiting time where the Judge has excused counsel. If more than one hour’s waiting time is claimed per activity (eg waiting time for trial or waiting time for sentencing) the following information is required:  a summary of both the waiting time and hearing time on the day of appearance – date and times  an explanation of the circumstances is also required. This must include: - confirmation that the provider was un...

10. [2022] NZACC 88 – Pol v ACC (12 May 2022) [pdf, 284 KB]

    ...an email to the Corporation, attaching a letter from Mr Pol, dated 25 May 2020. The letter was addressed to the chief executive officer (“CEO”) of the Corporation and listed various complaints about the management of his claim as well as a request for an “out of scope payment” to compensate Mr Pol for the suspension of his weekly compensation in September 2019, over and above the payment of backdated weekly compensation and interest which he had already received. [31] On...