20039 items matching your search terms
Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 He tono āwhina pūtea rōia mō ngā whakawā o te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti o Waitangi 09/22 form 14 Legal aid file No. Lead Provider’s Reference Application for Legal Aid for Waitangi Tribunal Proceedings To: Legal Aid DX SX10146 Welllington 1. He aha te nama Wai kua whakaritea mō te kerēme i mua i te aroaro o te Rōpū Whakamana i te Tiriti? (Mēnā kāore anō te nama kia whakaritea, tukua mai ā...
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 8 August 2023 Our ref: OIA 106127 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Hague Convention statistics Thank you for your email of 13 July 2023, requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding the Hague Convention. Specifically, you requested: I would like a list of all cases both inco...
...sexual exploitation … reach a threshold to be considered a material and substantive (but not only) cause of the development of [PTSD]. I believe that the sexual assaults and sexual exploitation [the appellant] experienced … reach a threshold of forming a material and substantive (but not only) cause of [enduring personality change] syndrome. Likely causation links to [generalised anxiety] disorder are more difficult to reliably attribute, particularly since its onset appears to...
...to a claim raises a positive defence, an evidential burden moves to that party to prove the defence on the balance of probabilities. When assessing whether the onus of proof has been discharged by a party, the Tribunal considers and evaluates the information and evidence presented by the parties in a neutral manner, and also takes into account the substantial merits and justice. I would like to reassure the parties that all information and evidence presented to the Tribunal has been consid...
...together with Immigration NZ’s fee, was received on 29 May 2023 (a total of $6,250). [8] The agency’s file record states that someone, presumably Mr Tran, “met” with the client and her mother on 9 June 2023 to discuss the application.1 The form of this 1 Documents Included in Client File (undated); BoD at 012. 3 meeting is not known. The client is understood to have remained in Vietnam at all relevant times. [9] On 10 June 2023, Mr Tran emailed to the client’s mo...
...to the BRC of 3 October 2023 and the BRC hearing on 9 April 2024, and that XXXX wished to appeal the BRC decision released to her on 3 October 2024. 6. The submission and documentation filed did not include the Authority’s notice of appeal form or some of the information requested in that form. A notice of appeal was subsequently filed by Mr Toilolo on 1 November 2024. 7. In response to the appeal the Ministry reviewed its decision. By the end of 2024 the Ministry indicated...
...provide life preserving services if industrial action occurs. (2) If an employer believes that it cannot arrange to deliver any life preserving service during industrial action without the assistance of members of the union, the employer must make a request to the union seeking the union’s and its members’ agreement to maintain or to assist in maintaining life preserving services. (3) The request must include specific details about— (a) the life preserving service the employ...
...2 3 139 Consent authorities and Environmental Protection Authority to issue certificates of compliance (1) This section applies if an activity could be done lawfully in a particular location without a resource consent. (2) A person may request the consent authority to issue a certificate of compliance. (3) A certificate states that the activity can be done lawfully in a particular location without a resource consent. (4) The authority may require the person to provide furthe...
...also for the purposes of this decision. [14] I have considered the response in full. [15] Key aspects of the response to the minute presented by SN were that SN is said to have been a “Non-Advising Principal”. Further: [15.1] SNJ had not requested payment of $4,837.50, only $2,868.75. The calculation of $4,837.50 was for the purposes of illustration only. The fee was reasonable, including on a comparative basis. [15.2] The Complainant falsely stated that the work was pro bono,...
...Mei Tatere and Denise Casey in common as to a 1/9th share each. [3] Those orders were subsequently drafted and sealed. The Te Aute Trust Board (TATB) now seeks to have them amended to accurately reflect, it says, the orders made. The amendments requested are: (a) Amend any reference to the “Te Aute Trust Board” to read “The Te Aute Trust Board” and amend any reference to the “Waiapu Board of Diocesan Trustees” to read “The Waiapu Board of Diocesan Trustees”; and...