Search Results

1. DT & Ors v MU [2025] NZDT 24 (17 January 2025) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...abnormalities of the supraspinous ligament, lumbar facet joints or dorsal sacral ligaments, which would indicate that the condition was not caused by falling after rearing. d) MU has presented a considerable amount of evidence of [the horse] performing well at equestrian events prior to sale and I accept there was no indication of poor behaviour indicating back pain. It is unfortunate that [the horse] appears to have had a latent condition that only became evident after the sale. The ve...

2. OIA-124845.pdf [pdf, 850 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 8 September 2025 Our ref: OIA 124845 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Ministry of Justice Boards Thank you for your email of 13 August 2025, to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry), requesting further information under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), regarding the Ministry’s Boards. Specifically, you requested: Ma...

3. NI v T Ltd [2025] NZDT 187 (2 May 2025) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...refund of fees paid to date? Is NI liable to pay the balance of fees? Was T Ltd authorised to tow NIs vehicle? 5. NI claims T Ltd breached their obligations under Rule 5.8 of the Land Transport Operating Licensing Rules 2017 as a tow authority form was not signed. However a tow authority was completed online that contained the relevant information as required by the Rule. FK, Yard Manager for T Ltd, states the online form is now standard and approved practice by Waka Kotahi. Th...

4. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v CAL012-E000609 [2013] NZCOP 5 [pdf, 61 KB]

   ...in the circumstances, it was confining its application to an order for payment under regs. 12(2)(a)-(c) of the Regulations, and was waiving its request for an additional deterrent sum to be awarded pursuant to r.12(2)(d). [11] Neither party has requested a hearing, and the Tribunal does not consider it necessary to convene one. Accordingly, this matter is determined on the papers in accordance with s.122L of the Act. Infringement [12] The Act creates a presumption that each inciden...

5. Dennett v Te Tumu Paeroa - Rotohokahoka D North 2A (2017) 178 Waiariki MB 24 (178 WAR 24) [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...parties had filed a joint memorandum of counsel advising that they considered it was unnecessary for the application to proceed to a hearing, and the application could be dismissed with no order as to costs. At the hearing however, Mr Dennett requested that the application not be dismissed and the issue of costs be considered. Judge Savage noted that the records sought were now to hand and reserved the issue of costs. He directed the trustees to file submissions as to costs within...

6. E5 Gordon Moller - Architect - EIC - Applicant [PDF, 1 MB]

   ...philosophy for the proposed syndicate bases is based on a maritime village environment, respecting and reusing key elements of the existing waterfront infrastructure, and developing a coordinated and coherent approach to a collection of building forms, materiality, texture, colour and lighting. The six new temporary base buildings comprise five located on Wynyard Point and one on an extended Hobson Wharf structure. 6. VIADUCT EVENTS CENTRE The key architectural ‘Parti’ (or i...

7. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...Human Rights Review Tribunal Complainant Glenn, Fran, Eamon Marshall (Our Ref: C/28032) Respondent IDEA Services Limited (“IDEA Services”) Matters investigated Whether IDEA Services responded appropriately to the Marshall's 15 May 2016 request for personal information (concerning his family and son). Whether IDEA Services took reasonable steps to check information was accurate, complete, relevant, up to date and not misleading before producing a report for the Ministry of...

8. XQ v T Ltd [2022] NZDT 85 (8 February 2022) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...in the rarest of circumstances, as set out in the section. I do not consider any of these exceptions apply in this case, and therefore I am unable to award XQ costs. Referee: M Wilson Date: 8 February 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

9. OQ v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 660 (24 November 2023) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...[car] in for repairs in January 2022. N Ltd initially advised her that a new timing chain kit was required. After further inquiries, N Ltd advised her that she needed a new motor. 6. OQ had mechanical breakdown cover up to $5,000.00. She informed N Ltd that she could not afford a new engine, so N Ltd endeavoured to locate a secondhand one through [second hand parts dealer]. N Ltd was unable to do so, and in April OQ’s partner advised N Ltd that he had searched online and fou...

10. Alves v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claims Process) [2023 NZACC 197] [pdf, 162 KB]

    ...Reviewer dismissed an application for review on the basis of lack of jurisdiction, in relation to the Corporation’s email of 16 January 2023. Background [2] On 22 February 2019, Mr Alves saw his GP, Dr Sonia Sparrow, who lodged an ACC claim form for an injury to his right elbow/forearm. Cover was subsequently accepted by the Corporation. 2 [3] On 17 September 2019, Mr Alves hurt his right shoulder moving a heavy desk at home. On 9 December 2019, the Corporation accepted...