Search Results

1. MLC-MAC - Retention & disposal appraisal report [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...19 6.4. Records about Land Use 21 6.5. Court Hearing Records and Legal Instruments 29 6.6. Case Management Records 32 6.7. Records of Appeal and Review Processes 33 6.8. Maintaining the Title Record 35 6.9. Registers and Indexes 37 6.10. Requests for derivation or other information from the Court Record 39 6.11. Maps and Plans 41 7. Access Restrictions on Records held at Archives New Zealand 43 8. Authorisation for Transfer of Records to Archives New ZealandError! Bookmark...

2. Retention and disposal appraisal report - Māori Land Court and Māori Appellate Court [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...18 6.4. Records about Land Use 20 6.5. Court Hearing Records and Legal Instruments 28 6.6. Case Management Records 31 6.7. Records of Appeal and Review Processes 32 6.8. Maintaining the Title Record 34 6.9. Registers and Indexes 36 6.10. Requests for derivation or other information from the Court Record 38 6.11. Maps and Plans 40 7. Access Restrictions on Records held at Archives New Zealand 42 Māori Land Court Retention and Disposal Schedule Appraisal Report Wha...

3. LCRO 196/2013 XM v WG [pdf, 481 KB]

   ...discussed with her, and that no offer would be accepted without her approval. Tenders closed on Friday 14 December 2012. Ms WG failed to contact her to discuss the tenders, as she had indicated that she would. (c) Ms WG had failed to respond to requests for information. Complaint 2 — 25 January 2013 (d) Ms WG continued to avoid providing information when requested. (e) Ms WG did not advise whether the tender offer or the valuation figures included GST. (f) Ms WG had faile...

4. [2014] NZEmpC 159 Franix Construction Ltd v Tozer [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...representatives take notes during investigation meetings but none was adduced at this hearing. An Authority Member may also take his or her own notes of the evidence and although such documents may be relevant in judicial review proceedings, they do not form part of the very limited record from the Authority’s investigation on a challenge such as this. Counsel for one of the parties was also that party’s representative in the Authority but was not permitted to give evidence fr...

5. Gill v Singh [2016] NZIACDT 36 (30 June 2016) [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...Mr Singh first had an agreement relating to those services on 8 November 2012. [6.3.3] Accordingly, Mr Singh entered the written agreement some 4 months after submitting the EOI, and a day prior to submitting the residence application. He had performed the majority of the services before entering the agreement, thereby breaching clauses 1.5(b) and 3 of the 2010 Code. [6.4] Mr Singh also failed to comply in relation to his instructions concerning the variation of the complainant’s wor...

6. LCRO 134/2018 AH v NR (7 April 2019) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...Failure to honour undertaking [13] Mr NR said that the following day, 10 October 2017, he sent an email to Mr AH (a) pointing out that the Deed of Assignment “had not been signed by all parties” when Mr AH provided his undertaking, and (b) requesting an explanation about that from Mr AH. [14] He said Mr AH did not respond to either that request, or to his follow-up emails on 16, and 24 October 2017. He said Mr AH told him on the telephone on 24 October 2017 that [Mr AH] was ...

7. LCRO 2/2019 RCN and OCN as Trustees v MA, JS, LB and GD (27 May 2020) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...the owner of the property would ultimately be accruing significant income from the property. [79] It seems, however, that Mr and Mrs CN did not ask for advice relating to the overall project. In their complaint, Mr and Mrs CN say that “they requested a Trust ([Name] Trust) be set up”. This implies that they went to Mr LB with a specific request. [80] In his response to the letter from this Office following the hearing, Mr LB says he was not asked for advice about the developm...

8. MG v Jean Xiujing Hu [2019] NZIACDT 20 (10 April 2019) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...Consultants Ltd, of which she is a director. [5] In about 2012, the complainant decided to migrate to New Zealand with her family. She decided to purchase from Ms H a fast food business for NZ$300,000. The complainant and Ms H entered into some form of conditional contract in about April 2012 (unseen by the Tribunal). It was agreed between the complainant and Ms H that the latter would be responsible for ensuring that the complainant’s Long-Term Business Visa (LTBV) was obtain...

9. Appendix 7 - Worked examples - other examples [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...gap is determined to be legitimate, the gaps are filled following the method. v. The margin of error for the filtered record is consistent with the margin of error associated to a pipe meter (5%) or and open flow channel meter (10%). Typically, RS forms (RS1 for a pipe meter or RS2 for an open channel flow meter) are requested from the consent holder, and/or ORC to confirm the verification record for the water meter. b) Auditing the daily (m3/day) abstraction record: i. The daily vol...

10. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee v Deobhakta [2014] NZLCDT 50 [pdf, 132 KB]

    ...consideration of penalty. [5] He wished as well to rely on an affidavit sworn by Donald Drummond on 6 August 2014 which he said was evidence by way of rebuttal of “alleged corruption in NZLS”. [6] Mr Clancy for the Standards Committee opposed the request for adjournment. He submitted that the practitioner had been aware of the Tribunal’s decision since December 2013 and thus had time to exercise his right to appeal the decision and had not done so. He said that there was...