FB v WBOPSC2 LCRO 184 / 2010 (26 August 2011) [pdf, 56 KB]
...to release the new information. He considered that the referral to the Disciplinary Tribunal was an unjust outcome, and that there was no certainty about what the charges were to be. He considered that no misconduct had been identified despite requests from him as to what rule had been broken. Review [6] The Practitioner sought to be heard on his review application and an Applicant- Only hearing was arranged for 6 July 2011. This may be a first step in an LCRO review to ascerta...