Search Results

1. MG v Jean Xiujing Hu [2019] NZIACDT 20 (10 April 2019) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...Consultants Ltd, of which she is a director. [5] In about 2012, the complainant decided to migrate to New Zealand with her family. She decided to purchase from Ms H a fast food business for NZ$300,000. The complainant and Ms H entered into some form of conditional contract in about April 2012 (unseen by the Tribunal). It was agreed between the complainant and Ms H that the latter would be responsible for ensuring that the complainant’s Long-Term Business Visa (LTBV) was obtain...

2. Appendix 7 - Worked examples - other examples [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...gap is determined to be legitimate, the gaps are filled following the method. v. The margin of error for the filtered record is consistent with the margin of error associated to a pipe meter (5%) or and open flow channel meter (10%). Typically, RS forms (RS1 for a pipe meter or RS2 for an open channel flow meter) are requested from the consent holder, and/or ORC to confirm the verification record for the water meter. b) Auditing the daily (m3/day) abstraction record: i. The daily vol...

3. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee v Deobhakta [2014] NZLCDT 50 [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...consideration of penalty. [5] He wished as well to rely on an affidavit sworn by Donald Drummond on 6 August 2014 which he said was evidence by way of rebuttal of “alleged corruption in NZLS”. [6] Mr Clancy for the Standards Committee opposed the request for adjournment. He submitted that the practitioner had been aware of the Tribunal’s decision since December 2013 and thus had time to exercise his right to appeal the decision and had not done so. He said that there was...

4. FB v WBOPSC2 LCRO 184 / 2010 (26 August 2011) [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...to release the new information. He considered that the referral to the Disciplinary Tribunal was an unjust outcome, and that there was no certainty about what the charges were to be. He considered that no misconduct had been identified despite requests from him as to what rule had been broken. Review [6] The Practitioner sought to be heard on his review application and an Applicant- Only hearing was arranged for 6 July 2011. This may be a first step in an LCRO review to ascerta...

5. Auckland Transport 156 [PDF, 64 KB]

   ...Trust v Auckland Council 2. Auckland Transport is a person who has an interest in the proceedings that is greater than the interest that the general public has, as it is responsible for local traffic and transport infrastructure and services forming part of the Auckland transport system as set out in the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009, and the Local Government Act 1974. Auckland Transport is the asset manager on behalf of Auckland Council, the requiring authority...

6. Auckland Transport 232 [PDF, 64 KB]

   ...Limited v Auckland Council 2. Auckland Transport is a person who has an interest in the proceedings that is greater than the interest that the general public has, as it is responsible for local traffic and transport infrastructure and services forming part of the Auckland transport system as set out in the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009, and the Local Government Act 1974. Auckland Transport is the asset manager on behalf of Auckland Council, the requiring authority...

7. Auckland Tranport 155 [PDF, 64 KB]

   ...Limited v Auckland Council 2. Auckland Transport is a person who has an interest in the proceedings that is greater than the interest that the general public has, as it is responsible for local traffic and transport infrastructure and services forming part of the Auckland transport system as set out in the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009, and the Local Government Act 1974. Auckland Transport is the asset manager on behalf of Auckland Council, the requiring authorit...

8. IX v SC LCRO 226 / 2010 (13 March 2012) [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...to ADH who acted for ADG. The company took possession of the premises over the Christmas break. [5] Following enquiry of ADH as to when the lease would be signed, that firm sent a letter to Mr SC in which amendments to the draft lease were requested. Significant correspondence then ensued between Mr SC and ADH and after some amendments to the document, the lease was executed by ADG, largely in the form as prepared by Mr SC. [6] Mr SC rendered an account for $3,792.00 plus G...

9. Clean slate scheme - Māori [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...and your criminal convictions history will be disclosed. Mēnā kāore e tutuki i a koe ngā whakaritenga katoa, kāore koe e āhei atu mō te kaupapa ‘huna i ō whiu o mua’, ā, ka whākina tō whakaaturanga whiu taihara. For more information go to the Clean Mō ētahi atu kōrero haere ki te Clean Slate Act. Slate Act. If you need help from a translator, call the Ministry of Justice on 0800 918 8800 and ask for Language Line and the language you want. Ki te hiahia i...

10. Govind v Chandra [2018] NZIACDT 46 (15 November 2018) [pdf, 260 KB]

    ...specific application, and there was no live application. There is no dispute that Ms Chandra made an error in her approach, the question is whether the error was serious enough to justify a disciplinary response. [3] I have reached the view that the request for a character waiver does not justify an adverse disciplinary finding. [4] Unfortunately, this matter was heard, and the record of the proceeding being incomplete was misplaced. I apologise to the parties for the delay. The...