Search Results

1. ORC - EIC - Felicity Boyd - 15 October 2021 [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...dated 15 October 2021. 7 80057.01, 80093.01. 8 80070.02 9 80090.01, 80090.02 10 80097.01 11 80070.02 7 do not meet minimum contact recreation standards or provide for ecosystems are improved in the short term,12 (c) Requesting water reforms to be based on catchments,13 and (d) Specifying the intention to identify critical source areas and topographical conditions relating to runoff in specific properties. 18 The specific decisions sought by submitters and my recommendati...

2. Eppanapally v Zhou [2014] NZIACDT 118 (28 November 2014) [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...working in the practice. She was the sole licence holder in the practice at that time. She wrote a submission in response to a query from Immigration New Zealand. However, Immigration New Zealand was not satisfied with the response, requested more information and provided a deadline for the reply. Ms Zhou rang Mr Eppanapally’s agent (though he disputes the person was authorised) and requested the particulars. [3] Further than that, Ms Zhou did not follow up, and Immigration New Zealand...

3. LCRO 189/2019 RT v AC (30 November 2020) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...office to discuss the proposed fee, but he did not attend at the arranged time. [15] Following that, Mr RT received an email from Mr JG, a partner of the firm [Law Firm AB], advising that he had been instructed by the ACs to act on the sale, and requesting to uplift the file. [16] By that stage Mr RT had set up the Landonline e-dealing in preparation for settlement of the sale and transfer of the title to the new owners. [17] Following termination of his instructions, Mr RT...

4. Hawke's Bay Standards Committee v Clarkson [2014] NZLCDT 2 [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...Trust for grazing on its land. They asked Ms Clarkson for detail of revenue and expenses, so that they could reconcile what was paid to them. Apart from some general information, Ms Clarkson did not provide the detail sought, despite numerous requests. The trustees considered there was a significant shortfall in amounts paid by NZCR to the PM Trust having regard to grazing fees they understood to have been received by NZCR in respect of the PM Trust land. [22] After further...

5. [2023] NZREADT 5 – KM v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 2102) (20 March 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...appellant says that the licensee, SC, the second respondent, conspired with the successful bidder to conceal from her the name of that bidder (and hence the interest of her husband). She further alleges that the licensee disclosed confidential information to the bidder, namely the reserve price. [2] The appellant complained against the licensee to the Real Estate Agents Authority (the Authority), the first respondent. Complaints Assessment Committee 2102 (the Committee) did not...

6. OIA-106152.pdf [pdf, 310 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 25 August 2023 Ref: OIA 106152 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request Thank you for your email of 20 July 2023, requesting information relating to physical child abuse offences under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act). Specifically, you requested: Data on offences relating to physical child abuse, s...

7. Williamson v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 134 [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...of losing payment of his weekly compensation if he refused to attend the initial medical assessment. [16] On 9 February 2018, Mr Williamson responded by letter saying: Please note that my email dated 7/2/18 was not a refusal, but contained a request for postponement due to the timing. Quote from letter: “I confirm my intention to decline by way of postponement, the occupational assessment scheduled with a Keith Innes Murray for 2 March 2018”. The primary reason for this bein...

8. [2007] NZEmpC WC 23/07 NZ Tramways and Public Passenger Transport Authorities Employees IUOW v Cityline (NZ) Ltd t/a Cityline Hutt Valley [pdf, 34 KB]

   ...of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) was determinative because it does not allow the Authority to make an order cancelling or varying a collective agreement or any term of it. The Authority said that if it were to meet the union’s request, the clear and certain effect would be clearly that of cancelling the agreement and that the validity of the purported agreement is a matter properly tested instead by way of an application for review under s194 of the Act. [4] The pla...

9. [2006] NZEmpC AC 74/06 Sandifer v Plumbers Gasfitters & Drainlayers Board NZ [pdf, 34 KB]

   ...the defendant as to the plaintiff’s ability to work are of some substance because the plaintiff has not taken the opportunity extended to him of refuting them. [23] However because of the indication of the lack of income disclosed by the tax forms I am prepared to reduce the amount of the award sought by the defendant in order to provide some realistic response to the plaintiff’s claims of impecuniosity. I therefore order the plaintiff to pay $4,000 as a contribution towards the...

10. [2006] NZEmpC AC 42/06 Mills v Macks Seafoods (1997) Ltd [pdf, 32 KB]

    ...2005 and in submissions filed by counsel for the defendant in relation to the defendant’s application for disclosure. [2] The plaintiff sought disclosure documents from the defendant and claimed that the defendant did not fully comply with his request and that this required the plaintiff to apply to the Court for an order of disclosure. The plaintiff’s application was set down for hearing on 21 October 2005. [3] Following negotiations on the morning of the allocate...