Search Results

1. Chalecki v ACC [2012] NZACA 16 [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...sought was for the allowance to be paid to the appellant as at the date of incapacity. Mr McCarthy also asked for copies of relevant documentation. [16] Unfortunately, the entire evidence for the appeal comprises the documents referred to above, the forms supporting the original RE assessment, the applications for review, all, apart from one of the applications for review, being filed by the appellant. [17] Despite being obliged under s 108(4) to provide copies of all relevant docu...

2. Harland v ACC [2012] NZACA 2 [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...application with written submissions. [6] Mr Nee Harland filed the application by way of a simple letter, which I accept as amounting to an application by Ms Nee Harland to reinstate the appeal under ACA No. 02/05. [7] The Corporation filed a formal opposition and submissions from Mr McBride, with a bundle of relevant documents and a supporting affidavit from Mark Davis, who was employed by the Corporation as an Improvement Analyst between 2002 and 2008, to address the large...

3. LCRO 212/2016 LM v HR (22 September 2017) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...in which lawyers and conveyancers are to deal with each other following the recognition of conveyancing practitioners as a profession in the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006.2 1 The application form provides for the name of a company to be inserted as the applicant with provision for communications to be marked for the attention of an individual. In the form the applicant was recorded as being LMN Law with Mr LM being the person to co...

4. ENV-2016-AKL-000239 Colgan v Auckland Council amended appeal [pdf, 879 KB]

   ...(recommendations in the SOUTH) as listed below, with accompanying reasons, alternative solutions and section 32M evaluation (where necessary): Attachment B: Copy of Hearing Panel's recommendation to Council (page 15) There were a number of requests for changes to the Rural Urban Boundary that the Panel does not support. The Council also did not support these changes (for a summary of the Council's views see its closing comments on Topic 016/017 of 19 February 2016). The Panel...

5. LCRO 207/2015 CA v BE (21 August 2018) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...that are first raised at the review stage of the proceedings. The Parties’ Arguments [34] Mr ZK identified Mrs CA’s main concern, (described by him as her “highest point of objection”) as concern that Mr BE had refused to comply with request to ensure that his client’s complaints were kept confidential. As this argument was advanced, it appeared to be the case that it was being suggested that Mr BE had given indication of his intention to interview potential witnesses...

6. Ruddelle v Auckland District Health Board [2021] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...2015 Ms Ruddelle complained to the HDC about Dr Bidwell’s conduct. The complaint was ultimately dismissed by the HDC. [5] In October 2015, when reviewing her file to respond to the HDC complaint, Dr Bidwell realised she had not completed the ACC forms for Michael. Prompted by that, Dr Bidwell reviewed Michael’s file and wrote to Dr Kathryn Edward and Dr Bevan who were now treating Michael and completed the ACC form. These actions are collectively the subject of this claim, as in e...

7. [2020] NZSSAA 8 (30 April 2020) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...May 2019, she also raised other, broader issues. [8] We have given XXXX the opportunity to present the issues of substance that concern her. Background The District Court proceedings [9] The Ministry brought prosecutions against XXXX which form the background to these proceedings. On 28 April 2015, the Ministry told XXXX that it had information that she was in a de facto relationship which may affect her benefit. The Ministry referred to her request on 17 April 2015 for full...

8. [2023] NZIACDT 22 - OT v Ramos (27 June 2023) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...distress is not intended as compensation for an inability to obtain residence. It is questionable whether any amount for emotional distress is appropriate. [48] The complainant has also sought $5,000 for legal costs relating to two Ministerial requests. Yet, there is no evidence these costs have been incurred. Equally problematic is that there is no sensible basis for two requests to the Minister. [49] The complainant has additionally sought $4,450 for legal representation an...

9. M Ltd v KC [2023] NZDT 26 (2 February 2023) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...the Tribunal has the onus of proving his or her claim/counterclaim on the civil standard of proof which is the balance of probabilities (that is, that it is more likely than not). I would like to reassure the parties that I have considered all the information and evidence presented by them when making my determination on the issues, but this order only refers to essential evidence and information material to the issues and is not intended to be a full record of the hearings or of the infor...

10. [2024] NZEnvC 080 Digital Signs Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 282 KB]

    ...side closest to the motorway; (b) to apply long-life decals of a photo-real image of Pōhutukawa trees on the exterior of the domes; and (c) to fit two LED displays on the side of each dome visible from the motorway. [6] The documents forming the application for a building consent which have been put before the Court clearly show the domes being additional structures located on the roof of the existing building. They show the flattened sides of the domes facing 3 toward...