Search Results

1. IC v CH [2022] NZDT 104 (7 September 2022) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...in addition to the purchase price. 2. When IC contacted CH to arrange shipping, he refused to make the goods available, emailing that he had made a mistake when setting up the auction because he “did not realise there was a reserve”. He informed her he could not let a collection worth “nearly $1000.00 go for $100.00”. 3. CH did not supply a phone number in order to participate in the hearing – the absence of a party does not prevent a hearing from going ahead or an orde...

2. 2021 October - Family Violence Provider Update [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...questions, we have asked for further detailed guidance on mask use in social service settings – watch this space. We encourage you all to subscribe to the COVID-19 updates from MSD, this can be done by emailing Community_Information@msd.govt.nz and requesting to be added to the email distribution list. Quarterly reporting update and timeframes The quarterly reports for quarter 1 (July – September 2021) are due on 20 October 2021. Given the instability of the last few months,...

3. T Ltd v Q Ltd [2022] NZDT 93 (2 September 2022) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...compressor, charger and battery kit (the kit) online through Q Ltd for $1079.00. 2. Q Ltd responded to the online order that the product was not available instore and would therefore have to be ordered from the supplier. 3. On 22 July Q Ltd informed T Ltd that the kit was no longer available and refunded T Ltd his payment. 4. T Ltd is claiming $2,000.00 for the cost of purchasing the kit as to acquire the kit the individual components of the kit now have to be purchased separa...

4. SK v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 196 (12 May 2023) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...Ltd has demonstrated they had the authority of the lessee of the land to tow vehicles from its site, his claim for a refund and associated costs does not succeed. Referee Perfect Date: 12 May 2023 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

5. XP v O Ltd [2023] NZDT 729 (12 December 2023) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...Tribunal orders: O Ltd is to pay XP the sum of $750.00 immediately. Reasons Hearing 1) XP filed this claim on 9 August 2023 and a hearing was notified for 4 October 2023. 2) However when contacted on that day, a representative of O Ltd informed the tribunal that O Ltd : “was unprepared for the hearing today…because the manager who was to act on behalf of the company was at hospital for a procedure …The Registry was not notified of this.” 3) Accordingly a furth...

6. NK v ND [2023] NZDT 754 (7 December 2023) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...against ND Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Refused The Order of 5 September 2023 stands. Reasons for decision: 1. NK filed a rehearing application on 28 September 2023, dated 22 September 2023, saying he was not informed of the hearing date and had to do the hearing in his car without his notes or documents relating to the case and because of this there was confusion about the amount ND had paid him and then owed. He maintained the original price for...

7. N Ltd v O Ltd [2022] NZDT 245 (25 November 2022) [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...required to do as an agent acting for O Ltd. I was not responsible in any way for the delays that led to the death of paua. The actions of N Ltd did not cause O Ltd to have a failure of the delivery of live paua. Did N Ltd fail to disclose information about B Ltd’s terms and conditions to O Ltd? 3. O Ltd has claimed that N Ltd failed to notify O Ltd of terms and conditions on the Waybill supplied by B Ltd and therefore O Ltd was not aware that B Ltd would not be responsible f...

8. SU v WC [2022] NZDT 215 (21 November 2022) [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...that I should award SU. 18. For these reasons the claim by SU against WC is proved. 19. For these reasons WC is to pay SU $2,755.32. Referee: K Johnson Date: 21 November 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

9. DG v CM [2024] NZDT 207 (7 February 2024) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...prior to the sale and advised that the car should not be driven as further damage could be caused and it was unsafe. [Mechanic workshop] owner KI confirmed in writing that the invoice had been modified from the original, and that CM had also been informed verbally that the issue made the car both liable to further damage if driven with the fault unrepaired, and unsafe to drive. 8. Issue: Did CM misrepresent the condition of the car to DG, thereby inducing DG to enter the contract...

10. D Ltd v R Ltd [2024] NZDT 228 (8 March 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

    ...no evidence. NY for R Ltd said they had requested [authorities]’s representative to attend the second hearing as a witness, but [authorities] declined to appear. Nevertheless, given the issues raised by R Ltd there would have been other written forms of evidence, such as independent testing, to support its claims, yet nothing was presented by R Ltd. D Ltd say that their work was done properly and the neighbour was causing problems for the site. 5. In the absence of any evidence...