Search Results

1. Eppanapally v Zhou [2014] NZIACDT 118 (28 November 2014) [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...working in the practice. She was the sole licence holder in the practice at that time. She wrote a submission in response to a query from Immigration New Zealand. However, Immigration New Zealand was not satisfied with the response, requested more information and provided a deadline for the reply. Ms Zhou rang Mr Eppanapally’s agent (though he disputes the person was authorised) and requested the particulars. [3] Further than that, Ms Zhou did not follow up, and Immigration New Zealand...

2. LCRO 189/2019 RT v AC (30 November 2020) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...office to discuss the proposed fee, but he did not attend at the arranged time. [15] Following that, Mr RT received an email from Mr JG, a partner of the firm [Law Firm AB], advising that he had been instructed by the ACs to act on the sale, and requesting to uplift the file. [16] By that stage Mr RT had set up the Landonline e-dealing in preparation for settlement of the sale and transfer of the title to the new owners. [17] Following termination of his instructions, Mr RT...

3. Hawke's Bay Standards Committee v Clarkson [2014] NZLCDT 2 [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...Trust for grazing on its land. They asked Ms Clarkson for detail of revenue and expenses, so that they could reconcile what was paid to them. Apart from some general information, Ms Clarkson did not provide the detail sought, despite numerous requests. The trustees considered there was a significant shortfall in amounts paid by NZCR to the PM Trust having regard to grazing fees they understood to have been received by NZCR in respect of the PM Trust land. [22] After further...

4. [2023] NZREADT 5 – KM v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 2102) (20 March 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...appellant says that the licensee, SC, the second respondent, conspired with the successful bidder to conceal from her the name of that bidder (and hence the interest of her husband). She further alleges that the licensee disclosed confidential information to the bidder, namely the reserve price. [2] The appellant complained against the licensee to the Real Estate Agents Authority (the Authority), the first respondent. Complaints Assessment Committee 2102 (the Committee) did not...

5. OIA-106152.pdf [pdf, 310 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 25 August 2023 Ref: OIA 106152 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request Thank you for your email of 20 July 2023, requesting information relating to physical child abuse offences under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act). Specifically, you requested: Data on offences relating to physical child abuse, s...

6. Williamson v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 134 [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...of losing payment of his weekly compensation if he refused to attend the initial medical assessment. [16] On 9 February 2018, Mr Williamson responded by letter saying: Please note that my email dated 7/2/18 was not a refusal, but contained a request for postponement due to the timing. Quote from letter: “I confirm my intention to decline by way of postponement, the occupational assessment scheduled with a Keith Innes Murray for 2 March 2018”. The primary reason for this bein...

7. Davis v Accident Compensation Corporation (Deemed Cover; Personal Injury) [2025] NZACC 79 (12 May 2025) [pdf, 3.9 MB]

   ...She has an appointment with the specialist on 20th March 2024, after which she will determine if she can work. [15] On 4 March 2024, Ms Davis telephoned the Corporation and discussed her claims. The notes from the conversation recorded: client requesting WC for accident in 2022 - is seeking an MRI scan to determine what issue is. Explained eco dates to client regarding sprains on how we would typically see these resolved by now. Client said pain never full went away since accid...

8. Trask v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation and Social Rehabilitation) [2025] NZACC 143 (2 September 2025) [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...Trask’s lower spine identified no significant focal pathology, but some mild disc narrowing posteriorly at the lumbosacral junction. 3 [6] On 28 May 2008, Mr Oakley reported on the x-ray done: Timothy has had his lumbar spine xrays performed. These show normal alignment. There is some loss of disc height at the L4/5 level, but little else to see. These xrays would be in keeping with a young man with mechanical back pain of a discogenic origin. … [7] On 21 December 2...

9. Trustees of Maungatautari 4G Sec IV v Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust - Maungatautari No 4G Sec IV (2014) 86 Waikato Maniapoto MB 248 (86 TTK 248) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...execution of the lease and easement instrument, little work was done on the question of land owner approval being sought for “authorised persons” to access the block. [98] This issue seems to have come to life in late 2013. WDC have responded to requests for personal information by requiring an explanation and assurances from the trustees that information acquired would only be used for the purposes of approval, that 86 Waikato Maniapoto MB 269 applicants would be infor...

10. Māori Trustee v Forde – Section 186 Block V Longwood Survey District (2013) 17 Te Waipounamu MB 152 (17 TWP 152) [pdf, 206 KB]

    ...respondents believed this roadway to be road reserve belonging to the Southland District Council (“SDC”). [3] In February 2009 a survey found Ouetota Road was entirely on the respondent’s land, with the legal access to Section 186 being an unformed paper road running along the beach parallel to Ouetota Road. I will refer to this road as the “beach road”. [4] The respondents have prevented use of Ouetota Road by the applicant and its lessees. They say the roadway is on...