[2009] NZEmpC AC 22/09 EBIIWU & Ors v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [pdf, 42 KB]
...prefer the latter. That is not because the plaintiffs’ witnesses tried to mislead the Court. Rather, their recollections of events, now almost 3 years ago, was more vague and their understanding of what is at least a quasi-legal process for the formation of effective collective agreements, is less acute and informed than that of the other witnesses. [23] I accept the plaintiffs’ evidence that what was discussed at the ratification meeting on 21 July 2006 was the content of the...