Search Results

1. Whānau Protect (National Home Safety Service) evaluation report [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   ...advocates, alarm installers, property upgraders and referrers (110 people were invited1 and 50 eligible responses were received) 3. Administrative data from NCIWR, matched with Police Recorded Crime Victims Statistics (RCVS) 4. Client evaluation forms completed after the property upgrade, and exit interviews completed when the alarm is uninstalled 6 months’ later. Data was analysed using a mixture of statistical and thematic analysis....

2. [2020] NZEnvC 024 Panuku Developments Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...9-15 Carrick Place and 111 and 109 Valley Road as mitigating, longer­ term, the effects of the proposed development". They agreed with the Council's planner that there was no certainty about whether these developments would occur, or the form that they might take.9 [28] In relation to the AUP, the Commissioners noted that the proposal was contrary to certain key objectives and policies, and they considered that Panuku's experts had placed too much reliance on the high...

3. Family violence reform paper 2: Family violence civil law [pdf, 586 KB]

   1 Budget sensitive In confidence Office of the Minister of Justice Chair Cabinet Social Policy Committee REFORM OF FAMILY VIOLENCE LAW Paper Two: Family violence civil law Proposal 1. This paper is the second of three papers seeking Cabinet agreement to reforms to the law applying to family violence, following the review of family violence legislation. It seeks agreement to changes to the civil law relating to family violence, in particular the Domestic Violence Act...

4. 2019 Directory of Official Information V-Z [pdf, 608 KB]

   ...must be a lawyer who has at least seven years standing, and two must be medical practitioners, one of whom must be nominated by the Royal New Zealand Returned and Services’ Association; Veterans’ Advisory Board which responds to Ministerial requests for advice and may initiate work on such things as policies relating to veterans’ entitlements. The Board consists of not more than seven members and one serving veteran, nominated by the Chief of Defence Force, as an ex-o...

5. FV Reform Paper 2 Civil Law [pdf, 558 KB]

   1 Budget sensitive In confidence Office of the Minister of Justice Chair Cabinet Social Policy Committee REFORM OF FAMILY VIOLENCE LAW Paper Two: Family violence civil law Proposal 1. This paper is the second of three papers seeking Cabinet agreement to reforms to the law applying to family violence, following the review of family violence legislation. It seeks agreement to changes to the civil law relating to family violence, in particular the Domestic Violence Act...

6. [2013] NZEmpC 144 Jerard v Wildbore [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...Pullar said that Ms Jerard had entirely failed to communicate with him or Mr Wildbore from the time the personal grievance was raised in March 2012 until the statement of claim in this proceeding was served. This included a failure to respond to requests for wage and time records which Ms Jerard had a statutory obligation to provide. Mr Pullar also said that Mr Jerard had twice failed to attend mediation arranged through the Department of Labour. [8] In addition to requesting th...

7. LA - Part 2 - Areas of Law Waitangi Tribunal [pdf, 777 KB]

   ...for each area or category. Case examples should be cases where you played a substantial and active role. Examples need to demonstrate substantial and active involvement across the range of cases. Please complete the Waitangi Tribunal Case Examples Form. You must provide the following case examples: • Provide at least three examples of substantial Waitangi Tribunal proceedings. • Each example must demonstrate that you had a substantial and active involvement in the case. • all...

8. DY v WB LCRO 27 / 2010 (12 July 2011) [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...decision in respect of a complaint by the applicant against the respondent. Its decision was to take no further action in respect of the complaint pursuant to s138(2) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006. [2] At the end of that decision, information was provided as to the entitlement of the parties to apply for a review of that decision by this Office. [3] Included in that information was the following statement: ENTITLEMENT TO REVIEW BY LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER (LCRO)...

9. Mohi v Janson - Rotopounamu 2B3A (2009) 204 Napier MB 257 (204 NA 257) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...204 Napier MS 258 applicants in this matter) two weeks to respond. It was at this hearing that serious doubts were raised by the Court as to the merits ofthe Jansons' application. [5] The Jansons then, by letter dated 14 October 2008, requested the application be dismissed upon the grounds that they were unable to establish whether the land was alienated from the Crown, which is required in order to show that the land may be general land. A further ground for dismissal was...

10. [2016] NZSSAA 034 (28 April 2016) [pdf, 34 KB]

    ...is fully aware of the decision process. [7] Following receipt of the submission from the Authority the Chief Executive’s response was referred to the appellant’s advocate and further information was sought about the matter. An explanation was requested as to why there was no follow up on the Benefits Review Committee decision before February 2015 and a submission about the prospects of success requested. [8] In a response dated 25 September 2015 Mr Ellis has advised that:...