DV v RG LCRO 141/2015 (28 June 2016) [pdf, 79 KB]
...vendor’s lawyer on several occasions. However, he says he received no response until 29 July 2011 when the vendor’s lawyer advised Mr RG that the vendor had not signed the variation and the agreement was at an end. [7] The agreement was not performed. [8] Mr and Ms DV formed the view that Mr RG is responsible for the agreement not being performed because of the way he dealt with the variation and what followed, or perhaps more accurately, did not follow. Ms DV also believes Mr R...