Search Results

1. OIA-Compensation for wrongful conviction and detention - rates [pdf, 429 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T: 04 918 8800 | E: contactus@justice.govt.nz W: www.justice.govt.nz 6 November 2024 Dear OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT REQUEST: COMPENSATION FOR WRONGFUL CONVICTION AND DETENTION – RATES Thank you for your email of 15 October 2024 requesting information concerning the determination of the monetary compensation rates in the Compensation Guidelines for Wrongful Conviction and Detention (2023). Your...

2. [2025] NZEmpC 2 Young v Port of Tauranga Ltd [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...of the Port emailed Mr Young and two other potentially affected unvaccinated employees to inform them that the Port had received advice that the tug engineer role and the tug master role would be covered by the border order. The Chief Executive requested a meeting with the employees and their representatives. Mr Young responded that day and suggested meeting the following week. He also advised that he was arranging for a representative to attend the meeting with him. [15] In...

3. Wall v Karaitiana - Tauhara Middle 15 (2011) 38 Waiariki MB 218 (38 WAR 218) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...trustees expressed concern at the potential for confusion and delay should nominations be received from the floor. Counsel submitted that one of the advantages of having a nomination cut off date before the meeting was the ability to pre- print voting forms with the names of the candidates included on the form. In the absence of a nomination cut off date, either the ballot papers will have to be left blank and the beneficiaries voting will have to record by hand the names of the nomi...

4. Dudley - Matoa, Whara and Te Karaka Ahu Whenua Trust (2017) 150 Taitokerau MB 151 (150 TTK 151) [pdf, 275 KB]

   ...SGM. [13] A final hearing was held on 26 April 2017 (“the final hearing”). 8 Ms Dudley was unable to attend the final hearing due to ill health and sought an adjournment. At the commencement of the final hearing, I raised Ms Dudley’s request with those present and heard submissions both in support of, and in opposition to, the request for an adjournment. I declined the adjournment and proceeded with the hearing. [14] Audrey Martin subsequently advised that Ms Dudley had...

5. LCRO 75/2016 XN and WN v VO (25 February 2019) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...neighbouring properties (the main access). [4] For some years, until they built a house on their property, Mr and Mrs VO used temporary accommodation. In order to provide a suitable house site they had to raise 2 the level of the building platform on their chosen site, and obtain alternative vehicular access across the N property. [5] Mr XN indicated he wished to defer any agreement on Mr and Mrs VO’s request for an alternative access until a proposed change to the Council...

6. Guide to the Draft Exposure Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...draft Bill for referendum This guide to the exposure draft Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill (the Bill) explains the core aspects of the regulatory approach and how they work together if the Bill were introduced in its current form. The structure of this guide is the same as the Bill and is designed to be read alongside the Bill using the cross references included throughout the guide. After the election and the referendum, the incoming Government may introduce a Bi...

7. La - Part 2 - Areas of Law Māori Land Court and Māori Appellate Court [pdf, 770 KB]

   ...Case examples should be cases where you played a substantial and active role. Examples need to demonstrate substantial and active involvement across the range of cases. Please complete the Māori Land Court and Māori appellate Court Case Example Form. You must provide the following case examples: • Provide at least three examples of substantial Māori Land Court and Māori appellate Court proceedings. • Each example must demonstrate that you had a substantial and active involvem...

8. [2016] NZSSAA 032 (20 April 2016) [pdf, 34 KB]

   ...application for assistance for food, a bed, a set of drawers and a fridge/freezer. Assistance by way of recoverable advances was made for the drawers, bed and fridge. A non-recoverable food grant of $150 was made for food. 2 [7] A request for review of the decision in relation to the food grant was lodged by Auckland Action Against Poverty on behalf of the appellant. The matter was reviewed internally and by a Benefits Review Committee. The appellant did not attend the B...

9. ENV-2016-AKL-000273 Housing New Zealand Corporation v Auckland International Airport [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...Corporation), hereby covenants, acknowledges and agrees with the Grantee as a covenant for the benefit of the Grantee 3 itself and its lessees, licensees and invitees on the Dominant Tenement from time to time, that the Grantor will observe and perform all the stipulations and restrictions contained in Schedule One of this Annexure Schedule to the end and intent that each of the stipulations and restrictions shall, in the manner and to the extent prescribed, ensure for the ben...

10. CX-v-XC-Law-Firm-2015-NZDT-885-16-July-2015 [pdf, 118 KB]

    ...reached at mediation. CX signed the mediation settlement on 11 March and confirmed it the following day, but has subsequently sought to challenge it and continue with an appeal. [4] XC Law Firm have invoiced $5,045.55 for these services and CX requests a declaration of non-liability for that amount and for contractual interest added. XC Law Firm claim contractual interest of $1,068.97 to the date of the Tribunal hearing and submitted a counter-claim for payment of $5,742.47 inclu...