Search Results

1. [2007] NZEmpC AC 61/07 Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd v van Heerden [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...for the DWU, was involved in the consultation process and sat on a site consultative committee (the “SCC”) which was formed under the CA with two union and two management representatives. Affected employees were invited to fill out preference forms to indicate what roles they would be interested in. [9] It is to the credit of both Fonterra and DWU and, in particular, to the work of the SCC, that the restructuring of the two laboratories was carried out without any compulsory...

2. UY v Bunbury LCRO 17 / 2012 (4 March 2013) [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...for the trading name, and [Company Zb]. [5] Mr UY’s speciality was production and design, and he acknowledges that he relied heavily on senior staff for general and financial administration of the company. [6] In [the 1980s], the company had formed a working relationship with Mr UZ, whose wife operated [a North Island] store. Mr UZ held himself out as [a professional] with considerable business experience, and Mr UY and Mr UZ formed a friendship which developed from the advice an...

3. LD & KL Trust v MT & HB LCRO 25/2015 (15 April 2016) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...administering the loans advised what steps they were taking or intended to take to recover the funds for the contributors. They expressed confidence. They invited the contributors to contact them if they had any queries. [33] That is not the same as requesting the contributor to advise the lawyers if the contributor does not agree with the action or proposed action. Neither did the letters indicate that the lawyers were obliged to consider the views of contributors. [34] Rule 13....

4. LCRO 63/2024 WL v AC and TU (25 November 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...employment and would start making payments once he was settled into the role. He also referred to the likely receipt of an inheritance. [29] The second-named respondent (second respondent) became involved at that point. On 10 February 2023, he requested from the applicant a timeframe for full payment and a payment plan to be advised by 15 February 2023. [30] The applicant replied the same day making various comments but reiterating his commitment to settling the account and asked...

5. Moonen v Accident Compensation Corporation (Rehabilitation – Aid for Appliance) [2024] NZACC 186 (20 November 2024) [pdf, 354 KB]

   ...the judo accident. Mr Moonen then sought entitlements and on 14 May 1999 Mr Ray Fong, orthopaedic surgeon, reported to the Corporation: “Xray done in the Hutt Radiology Clinic on 31.5.90 shows marked narrowing of the L3/4 disc with osteophyte formation. In the lateral view there is no displacement. In the AP view there is slight lateral subluxation of the vertebral body of L3 on 4.” [12] Mr Moonen was also seen by Mr Andrew Simmonds, orthopaedic surgeon, who noted: (a) Letter...

6. Ly v Navarette-Scholes [2015] NZIACDT 46 (29 April 2015) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...Navarette-Scholes met with the complainant and the niece at her business premises in August 2012 and September 2012, and the applicant’s documents remained there. 3 [5.6] On 1 October 2012, the complainant’s lawyer wrote to Ms Navarette-Scholes requesting that the documents be returned urgently, as medical and police certificates were due to expire. Despite a further request, the documents remained with Ms Navarette-Scholes until 17 October 2012, and the complainant’s...

7. Klee v CAC 10064 & Little [2012] NZREADT 40 [pdf, 54 KB]

   ...to sell their property. Bridget Dickson 2 was the salesperson engaged to market and sell the property and she is the manager of Spillers. [3] About three or four weeks after agreeing to pay nearly $7,000 for advertising, the appellant requested to have the word “Auction” imbedded in red on the published advertising photograph for the property. This request was declined by the licensee on the basis that it did not comply with Bayleys’ advertising policies. Instead, a ...

8. DS v WH LCRO 163 / 2010 (16 August 2011) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...basis. 3. The complaint appeared to be an attempt by Mr DS to re-litigate the matter. [7] The Applicant has applied for a review of that decision and asserts that there is no evidential foundation to support the submission made to the Court. He requested that the matter be properly and honestly investigated and the decision reversed or modified. [8] In his original complaint to the Complaints Service, the Applicant sought an apology and an order that the Crown apply to recall the...

9. AP v RE LCRO 322/2012 (22 August 2014) [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...purchaser of one of those properties. [3] Settlement of the sale of three of the properties was scheduled to take place on 27 January 2012. Registered against two of the properties were two separate mortgages to the [ABC Bank].1 [4] Mr RE requested discharges of these mortgages but did not request separate repayment figures for each. 1 The Standards Committee recorded that there was one mortgage over all three properties to...

10. VR v AL LCRO 236 / 2012 (31 May 2013) [pdf, 115 KB]

    ...hearing was initially scheduled for 2 May 2013. However, this Office had difficulties communicating with Ms VR until immediately prior to the hearing when an email was received from Mr VR advising that Ms VR no longer resided in New Zealand. He requested advice as to whether or not a telephone conference was possible. [24] In a direct communication with Ms VR by the Case Manager, it was initially arranged that she would attend the hearing by telephone. However, she subsequently...