Search Results

1. UQ v Q Ltd [2025] NZDT 251 (10 June 2025) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...these reasons, UQ is not liable to pay any further money to Q Ltd in relation to parking breach notice [redacted] and Q Ltd’s counter claim is dismissed. C Bodle Disputes Tribunal Referee 10 June 2025 Page 4 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

2. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Hart [2011] NZLCDT 36 [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...charged by the practitioner to a client, Mr W. A summary of the events leading up to the laying of the charge is as follows: 21 November 2006 [8] Mr Tomlinson, a new lawyer for Mr W, made a complaint to Auckland District Law Society (“ADLS”) requesting a costs revision. 18 May 2007 [9] The practitioner and the client settled their costs dispute by private arrangement. It is noted in minutes of a meeting of Complaints Committee No. 2 dated 14 October 2008 that prior to the...

3. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Sensible Sentencing Group Trust [2014] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...information about his convictions for sexual offending the SSGT had no reasonable grounds for believing that any of the exceptions in Principle 11 applied to the disclosure. 3 [5.3] On 5 November 2009 the aggrieved person, by his legal adviser, requested personal information from the SSGT being the court documents held by the SSGT and the identity of the person who provided the documents to the SSGT (Principle 6). A decision on that request was not made within 20 working days aft...

4. DV v RG LCRO 141/2015 (28 June 2016) [pdf, 79 KB]

   ...vendor’s lawyer on several occasions. However, he says he received no response until 29 July 2011 when the vendor’s lawyer advised Mr RG that the vendor had not signed the variation and the agreement was at an end. [7] The agreement was not performed. [8] Mr and Ms DV formed the view that Mr RG is responsible for the agreement not being performed because of the way he dealt with the variation and what followed, or perhaps more accurately, did not follow. Ms DV also believes Mr R...

5. Paikea - Otara 5D1 (2016) 140 Taitokerau MB 78 (140 TTK 78) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...decision, Te Whata – Waiwhatawhata 1A2B6 Lot 1 DP 168554 (2008) 125 Whangarei MB 294 (125 WH 294), Judge Ambler comprehensively identified the relevant legal principles. I summarise those principles as follows: a) The PCA are entitled to be given formal notice of the application and hearing; b) The application is considered in two steps. First the Court must assess whether each of the five statutory preconditions set out in s 136 of TTWMA have been met. Once an applicant has s...

6. Guo v Culpan (Strike-Out) [2018] NZHRRT 25 [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...BACKGROUND [2] In November 2009, Ms Guo attended an appointment with Dr Culpan that had been arranged by her employer, Price Waterhouse Cooper (PwC). Ms Guo attended a further appointment with Dr Culpan in January 2010. On 31 August 2015, Ms Guo requested Dr Culpan to provide her with her medical file. The file was provided to her on 29 September 2015. 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Guo v Culpan (Strike-Out) [2018] NZHRRT 25]...

7. E71 Keith Ingram - EIC - Tug William C Daldy [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...Including a recent letter from Mayor Goff. We thank you for your assistance and consideration in this important matter. We would also be happy to appear for the consents hearing committee and be heard in respect to this submission if the Court so requests. Keith Luke Ingram. For and on behalf of the Tug William C Daldy Preservation Society Attachment’s Heads of Agreement Letter Mayor Goff Letter Maritime Museum 2206 WATE RFRO NT AUCKLAND P +64 9 3...

8. Wilson - The Heke and Miriama Hirini Whānau Trust (2016) 56 Tairawhiti MB 239 (56 TRW 239) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...application were (a) that the trustees had not adhered to the terms of the trust order, (b) that they had not treated all beneficiaries impartially, (c) that they had not made information pertaining to the Trust available to beneficiaries when requested, and (d) that they had not kept full accounts, minutes or correspondence. 6 [7] As directed by the Court, the trustees filed a report in response to the allegations. The trustees challenged Simon Hirini’s claim that he was a benef...

9. Trustees of the JS & AJ Hamilton Family Trust v Complaints Assessment Committee 403, Amelia (Margaret) Reeve, Fleur Allinson & Kim Franklin [2017] NZREADT 54 [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...unconditional (through their solicitors) on 29 February. The trustees’ solicitors advised the Agency of the confirmation on 1 March. On 3 March, Ms Reeve emailed a “Multi-offer disclosure/Real Estate Agents Authority Guide Acknowledgement form” (“the multi-offer form”) to the trustees, with a request that they sign it and return to her. [8] Both the trustees and the second purchasers asserted their right to complete the purchase. We will refer to the asserted rights to...

10. [2020] NZEnvC 172 Boyd v Queenstown Lakes District Council.pdf [pdf, 1.5 MB]

    ...THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Topic 16 - Rezonings Appeals Group 1 - Upper Clutha Application for directions under s293 A: Determination of the application for directions is reserved. While directions are considered appropriate in principle, further information is required to enable directions to issue. REASONS QTN PLAN APPEALS- TOPIC 16 - s293 DECISION 2 Introduction [1] Jackie Boyd, and Jackie and Simon Redai and several others1 ('Boyd Group') made a joint submission a...