Search Results

1. 5 March 2025 Johnson Bros Limited v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 337 KB]

   ...Management (Forms, Fees and Procedure) Regulations 2003. The time allocated by the Court provides an indication of your potential liability for Court hearing fees in this case. 2 PROCEDURES At the start of the hearing, the Court will consider any requests to: (a) Withdraw proceedings (b) Adjourn (postpone) hearings to a later date (c) Approve settlements agreed to all by the parties The Court will then decide the order in which the proceedings will be heard during the hearing. Part...

2. 19 March 2025 Rotokakahi Board of Control & Protect Rotokakahi Inc. v Rotorua District Council [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...half-day after that; or • For all other applications, the first half-day is free. After the first half-day there will be a $385 fee for each half-day or part half-day after that. The fees must be pre-paid in accordance with the Resource Management (Forms, Fees and Procedure) Regulations 2003. EC4180_NoticeOfHearing The time allocated by the Court provides an indication of your potential liability for Court hearing fees in this case. 2 PROCEDURES At the start of the hearing, the...

3. 20 August 2025 Rutherford v Canterbury Regional Council [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...Management (Forms, Fees and Procedure) Regulations 2003. The time allocated by the Court provides an indication of your potential liability for Court hearing fees in this case. 2 PROCEDURES At the start of the hearing, the Court will consider any requests to: (a) Withdraw proceedings (b) Adjourn (postpone) hearings to a later date (c) Approve settlements agreed to all by the parties The Court will then decide the order in which the proceedings will be heard during the hearing. Part...

4. 7 August 2025 Wang v Auckland Council & Pan v Auckland Council [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...half-day after that; or • For all other applications, the first half-day is free. After the first half-day there will be a $385 fee for each half-day or part half-day after that. The fees must be pre-paid in accordance with the Resource Management (Forms, Fees and Procedure) Regulations 2003. The time allocated by the Court provides an indication of your potential liability for Court hearing fees in this case. 2 PROCEDURES At the start of the hearing, the Court will consi...

5. What questions are asked?

   ...people don’t always know what are legally considered crimes, and what aren’t. Once collected, the incidents are coded by legal experts (Offence coding) to determine whether or not the incident was a crime, and what type of crime. General victim forms The participant can then fill in up to three general victim forms, based on their answers to the victim screening questions. The victim forms include questions about (but are not limited to) contact with the offender, insurance, weapons, wheth...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Research & data >
   3. New Zealand Crime & Victims Survey (NZCVS) >
   4. New Zealand Crime & Safety Survey (NZCASS)

6. [2011] NZEmpC 31 Ravnjak v Wellington International Airport Ltd [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...covered by s 52 as enacted in 1974 when, as a matter of judicial notice, I find such digital/electronic technologies were still to be invented or at least not yet in use. Mr Burton submitted that if Parliament had intended s 52 to extend to other forms of record gathering and record keeping, it would have used phrases of more general expression. Counsel pointed to s 4 of the PISG Act which uses the catch-all “or similar device[s]” in relation to cameras so that the use of digit...

7. LCRO 229/2017 and 021/2018 VL v YN (8 May 2019) [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...YN, Ms AD sent the following email at 1.48 pm to the vendor’s lawyer (Mr NL): Dear Mike We refer to the Agreement for Sale and Purchase dated 29 November 2016 and your fax dated 5 December 2016. Our purchaser client has instructed us to inform you that all conditions of this contract have been satisfied. This contract is therefore unconditional. We record that settlement is set down for Friday 27 January 2016. Please advise your e-dealing contacts and we look forward to receiv...

8. LCRO 192/2017 KY v QW, Official Assignee (27 September 2019) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...apologised. [26] He says upon Mr GC’s subsequent retirement as a partner, and the Official Assignee later “becoming aware of the missing files/transactional information”, those responsibilities fell to him. He says he provided the information requested to the Official Assignee upon discovering Mr GC had not done so. (2) Application of funds received [27] Mr KY submits that following the demand made by the barrister in August 2013 for payment of outstanding fees, his “in...

9. [2008] NZEmpC AC 49/08 Clear v Waikato DHB [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...conflict was their different perceptions of who was responsible for individual patients. Ms Clear believed that patients were “hers.” From Mrs Parata’s point of view, generally the patients were cared for by a team of midwives unless one requested a particular midwife to care for her. This led to mutual antagonism. [25] Midwives who had worked at the Tokoroa Maternity Ward from the 1970s onwards gave their views about this relationship and the working environment. Whi...

10. LA Provider Manual Part 1 - provider approvals [pdf, 990 KB]

    ...Chapter 1 – Submitting an application Overview Process The diagram below illustrates the process for how applications for approval are assessed. This chapter focuses on the information submitted by the applicant. Further information requested. If not received by date given, application is returned. Application assessed and sent to Selection Committee Application received and checked it is complete Complete Not complete Complete If approved, applicant may be of...