Search Results

1. ENV-2016-AKL-000274 Rockfield Trust v KiwiRail Holdings Limited [pdf, 15 MB]

   ...Proceedings You may be a party to the appeal if: a) you made a submission on the matter of this appeal; b) within 15 working days after the period for lodging a notice of appeal ends, you lodge a notice of your wish to be a party to the proceedings (in form 33) with the Environment Court and serve copies of your notice on the relevant local authority and the appellant; and c) within 20 working days after the period for lodging a notice of appeal ends, you serve copies of your notice...

2. [2017] NZEmpC 150 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs Ltd [pdf, 492 KB]

   ...relationship is. This is particularly so in cases involving vulnerable workers. [20] The sort of bright-line test advanced on behalf of the defendant runs the risk of obscuring the practical realities of working relationships, and focusing on form over substance. That is not an approach mandated by the Employment Relations Act, and is at odds with the underlying objectives of the legislation (including addressing inherent imbalances in bargaining power).9 [21] The full Court...

3. LCRO 197/2017 SM v HW (29 March 2019) [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...resolved under the Property (Relationships) Act 1976. [10] At 10.02 am on 22 December 2016, Ms SM’s lawyer stated (in her accompanying 21 December 2016 letter) that Ms HW, by acting for Mr JK and his parents against Ms SM was conflicted, and requested Ms HW to reconsider. Ms SM’s lawyer repeated that Ms SM wanted both properties sold, the sale proceeds held pending a Court order, and stated Ms SM did not agree to any funds being paid to Mr JK’s parents. [11] In response by...

4. [2019] NZEnvC 189 508 Chapel Road Partnership Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...H5 AUP. 4 The evidence as to traffic [13J There have been a number of amendments agreed between the traffic experts which are now incorporated into the application. Our understanding is the joint witness statement (JWS) from 17 April 2019 formed the basis for subsequent discussions between the planners. Although the JWS goes through the background, the importance is that the parties have moved through these issues and eventually looked at the key issues of contention. We brief...

5. [2024] NZSSAA 10 (5 September 2024) [pdf, 340 KB]

   ...Security Appeal Authority by XXXX of Nelson, against a decision of the Chief Executive that has been confirmed or varied by a Benefits Review Committee. BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY R Palu (Chairperson) G Pearson (former Chairperson) T Tran (Member) J Ryall (Member) Representation: Ms K Brereton for XXXX Mr N Palmer for the Chief Executive. DECISION Introduction [1] This case concerns the effect of a payment of arrears of...

6. ENV-2016-AKL-000192 Kiwi Property Group Limited & Kiwi Property Holdings Limited v Auckland Council (Transport) [pdf, 4.7 MB]

   ...Decision rejected the Hearing Panel's recommendations in that regard and, in the Metropolitan Centre, Town Centre, Local Centre and Mixed Use zone, removed the minimum carparking requirements and reinstated maximum carparking requirements for all forms of retail and all other activities. (e) The relief subject to the Hearing Panel's recommendations is appropriate for the following reasons: (i) Business zoned land is a valuable resource, which can be used to provide for...

7. [2010] NZEmpc 111 Smith v Stokes Valley Pharmacy (2009) Limited [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...of dealing in good faith with the employee, the employer is not required to comply with section 4(1A)(c) in making a decision whether to terminate an employment agreement under this section; and (b) the employer is not required to comply with a request under section 120 that relates to terminating an employment agreement under this section. [5] A “trial period” under s 67A may be distinguished from “[p]robationary arrangements” under s 67 although the two provisions contain...

8. [2017] NZEnvC 180 Ngai te hapu Incorporated v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...accordance with its decision, and to provide a clean copy of the interim consent that showed the disputed and the suspended and disputed interim conditions. [6] The Council has provided the Court with a clean copy of the amended interim conditions as requested. Determination [7] The Court is satisfied that the amended conditions provided by the Council reflect the decision of the Court, and identify those conditions that are currently in dispute and those that are in dispute and s...

9. Directory of Official Information 2019 M-O [pdf, 513 KB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings M-O About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz ma

10. [2021] NZEnvC 079 Guthrie v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2.1 MB]

    ...lodged with the Queenstown-Lakes District Council on 30 April 2018. It comprised a proposed 14-lot subdivision of the site, which provided for one allotment around the existing dwelling, 12 allotments each containing a new Residential Building Platform and one access lot to vest as public road. Further, land use consent was also sought to breach internal boundary setbacks which, at the time of notification, included breaches of the road boundary and internal boundary setback rules...