19711 items matching your search terms
Form 2D Objection to Court’s jurisdiction Employment Relations Act 2000 In the Employment Court No: / Registry Objection to Court’s jurisdiction Between [full name] of [address] Plaintiff And [full name] of [address] Defendant To the Registrar Employment Court at …………………………………………….. [place] and To the plaintiff Objection to Court’s jurisdiction 1 The defendant, …...
...assignments and the Court has no obligation to provide ongoing and consistent assignment to cases. Lay Advocates are not assigned to every Family Court case. A Judge can assign a Lay Advocate for a case at any point in the process. If the Judge doesn’t request a specific Lay Advocate, the Court Registry will select one from the pool. Where possible, the Judge or Court Registry will appoint a person who has sufficient standing in the culture of the child or young person. The Court wil...
...[13] The Donaldsons filed their evidence in relation to the outstanding issues on 9 April 2021 and the Trust filed the majority of its evidence on 7 May 2021, with the sworn affidavit of Mr Hemi on behalf of the Trust filed on 11 May 2021. At the request of the applicant, the Court granted leave for evidence in reply to be filed by 11 June 2021. The Donaldsons 3 206 Waikato Maniapoto MB 259-261 (206 WMN 259-261). 4 212 Waikato Maniapoto MB 143-145 (212 WMN 143-145). 5 214 Waika...
Receive your payment via direct credit by providing your bank account on the summons form and returning it by post, or complete the Online Form. You can also ask the court to pay for the related expenses by completing an expense claim form. Learn more: Payment and support to help you attend jury service
...lawyer who has at least seven years standing, and two 4 must be medical practitioners, one of whom must be nominated by the Royal New Zealand Returned and Services’ Association; Veterans’ Advisory Board which responds to Ministerial requests for advice and may initiate work on such things as policies relating to veterans’ entitlements. The Board consists of not more than seven members and one serving veteran, nominated by the Chief of Defence Force, as an ex-officio;
...lawyer who has at least seven years standing, and two 4 must be medical practitioners, one of whom must be nominated by the Royal New Zealand Returned and Services’ Association; Veterans’ Advisory Board which responds to Ministerial requests for advice and may initiate work on such things as policies relating to veterans’ entitlements. The Board consists of not more than seven members and one serving veteran, nominated by the Chief of Defence Force, as an ex-officio;
...section– Referenced 85121-01 – Drawing 313 Airey Consultants Ltd November 2022 Proposed Pedestrian Access Long-section– Referenced 85121-01 – Drawing 314 Airey Consultants Ltd A November 2022 Lots 1, 2, 3, 23 & 24 Access Platforms – Referenced 85121- 01 – Drawing 315 Airey Consultants Ltd A November 2022 Proposed Road Typical Cross Section Details – Referenced 85121-01 – Drawing 320 Airey Consultants Ltd B November 2022 Proposed Drainage Pl...
...first of the hearings allocated. I will say no more than that. [10] I turn to a third matter which I need to deal with. This morning an email was sent to the Court by Mr Cranney advising that at today’s hearing there would be raised a request by the plaintiffs for further particulars as to what provisions if any in the expired collective agreement are relied upon by the defendant for the purposes of s 66(4) of the Employment Relations Act 2000. That request relates to what i...
...should be cases where you played a substantial and active role. Examples need to demonstrate substantial and active involvement across the range of cases. For this area of law you must provide at least five case examples using the civil case examples Form: • at least three examples must demonstrate that you appeared as counsel with substantial and active involvement in civil proceedings. • at least two other examples must demonstrate that you assisted in the preparation of civil pro...
...that the “prosecution” would have “an opportunity to tailor its evidence according to the case theory set out in the defendant’s opening”. Again, Mr Rzepecky requested directions in accordance with his submissions. [5] Mr Rzepecky’s requests for directions are opposed by the Committee. Counsel for the Committee, Mr Hodge, submitted that the requests were contrary to an agreed timetable request, recorded in a consent memorandum dated 19 April 2016, which provided both f...