Search Results

1. Tuumotooa v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 57 (29 April 2014) [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...3(a)). [5] In outline, the background was: [5.1] In March 2011, the complainants engaged the Adviser to assist them to apply for visas. They paid $350 for the service. [5.2] The adviser lodged the visa applications. [5.3] Immigration New Zealand requested information, which the complainants provided to the adviser. [5.4] The adviser did not provide the information to Immigration New Zealand, and accordingly Immigration New Zealand declined the applications in May 2011. [5.5] Due...

2. CAC 20001 v Wallace [2016] NZREADT 66 [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...not submitted in proper form, Ms Wallace’s email is assumed to be a further application to adjourn the hearing of the charges against her. The document submitted by Ms Wallace in support of the application is inadequate for the purpose of a request for an adjournment. It gives no details as to in what respect Ms Wallace is “medically unfit”. For example, while stating that she “should be fit to resume work 1 December 2016”, it gives no indication as to in what respect she...

3. [2017] NZEmpC 44 Lyttelton Port Co Ltd v Arthurs [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...[1] The plaintiff has applied for a stay of proceedings of the determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) pending the Court deciding its challenge to that determination. 1 Background [2] The following background information is taken from the Authority determination. Mr Chris Arthurs was employed by Lyttelton Port Company Ltd 1 Arthurs v Lyttelton Port Co Ltd [2017] NZERA Christchurch 53. (LPC)

4. Genesis Energy Limited 96 [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...274 of the Act Between Director-General of Conservation Appellant and Waikato Regional Council Respondent Notice of Genesis Energy Limited’s wish to be party to proceedings 21 September 2020 26537951_2 Form 33 Notice of wish to be party to proceedings 1 To: The Registrar Environment Court Auckland 1. Genesis Energy Limited (Genesis) wishes to be a party to the following proceedings: (a) ENV-2020-AKL-000096 Director-General of...

5. Notice of Motion seeking direct referral 26 May 2020 redact [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...assist in providing economic stimulus. (f) The Project has been the subject of numerous public engagement processes and discussions between the Transport Agency and submitters, which has given submitters and the broader public considerable information in relation to the Application. Further, the Application was preceded by a designation process which attracted 742 submissions and was the subject of a two-week council-level hearing in March and April 2019, and three appeals to the...

6. 12 June 2020 Weston Lea Limited v Hamilton City Council & Director-General of Conservation v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...June 2020 TIME: 10:00 AM VENUE: Time Allocated: Hearing Room 5 Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre Level 1, 41 Federal Street, Auckland 1 day 1 PROCEDURES At the start of the hearing, the Court will consider any requests to: (a) Withdraw proceedings (b) Adjourn (postpone) hearings to a later date (c) Approve settlements agreed to all by the parties The Court will then decide the order in which the proceedings will be heard during the hearing. Par...

7. Further memorandum in respect of Strike Out Application of Guardians of the Bay and Hue te Haka (16 November 18) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...affidavit of Ms Weeber; (b) affidavit of Dr Rotmann; and (c) affidavit of Mr Shanks. 2. The latter is being, or is to be, filed by counsel for the Surfbreak Protection Society Inc in these proceedings. I understand it may be filed in final form but not yet affirmed, given timing constraints. 3. The affidavits of Ms Weeber and Dr Rotmann have also been filed directly with the Court by the deponents, again, given timing and logistical constraints. It is understood that service...

8. LO v BH Ltd [2019] NZDT 1555 (5 August 2019) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...suite because the items came together initially as one suite, that is, the same contract. Conclusion 16. For the reasons above, BH Ltd must pay LO $2,700.00. Referee: Ms G Jaduram Date: 5 August 2019 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to ap...

9. LN v JH Ltd [2022] NZDT 16 (18 February 2022) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...Act 1988). Presuming the LN was aware of this, I suppose his purpose was not so much about the money as about having his complaints properly heard. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 18 February 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

10. QH v TU Ltd [2022] NZDT 12 (22 March 2022) [pdf, 236 KB]

    ...I accept TU Ltd incurred costs to remove the vehicle and that they are entitled to retain the fee. 12. In view of the above, the claim is dismissed. Referee: K Edwards Date: 22 March 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...