Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 189 508 Chapel Road Partnership Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...H5 AUP. 4 The evidence as to traffic [13J There have been a number of amendments agreed between the traffic experts which are now incorporated into the application. Our understanding is the joint witness statement (JWS) from 17 April 2019 formed the basis for subsequent discussions between the planners. Although the JWS goes through the background, the importance is that the parties have moved through these issues and eventually looked at the key issues of contention. We brief...

2. [2024] NZSSAA 10 (5 September 2024) [pdf, 340 KB]

   ...Security Appeal Authority by XXXX of Nelson, against a decision of the Chief Executive that has been confirmed or varied by a Benefits Review Committee. BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY R Palu (Chairperson) G Pearson (former Chairperson) T Tran (Member) J Ryall (Member) Representation: Ms K Brereton for XXXX Mr N Palmer for the Chief Executive. DECISION Introduction [1] This case concerns the effect of a payment of arrears of...

3. [2011] NZEmpC 31 Ravnjak v Wellington International Airport Ltd [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...covered by s 52 as enacted in 1974 when, as a matter of judicial notice, I find such digital/electronic technologies were still to be invented or at least not yet in use. Mr Burton submitted that if Parliament had intended s 52 to extend to other forms of record gathering and record keeping, it would have used phrases of more general expression. Counsel pointed to s 4 of the PISG Act which uses the catch-all “or similar device[s]” in relation to cameras so that the use of digit...

4. LCRO 229/2017 and 021/2018 VL v YN (8 May 2019) [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...YN, Ms AD sent the following email at 1.48 pm to the vendor’s lawyer (Mr NL): Dear Mike We refer to the Agreement for Sale and Purchase dated 29 November 2016 and your fax dated 5 December 2016. Our purchaser client has instructed us to inform you that all conditions of this contract have been satisfied. This contract is therefore unconditional. We record that settlement is set down for Friday 27 January 2016. Please advise your e-dealing contacts and we look forward to receiv...

5. LCRO 192/2017 KY v QW, Official Assignee (27 September 2019) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...apologised. [26] He says upon Mr GC’s subsequent retirement as a partner, and the Official Assignee later “becoming aware of the missing files/transactional information”, those responsibilities fell to him. He says he provided the information requested to the Official Assignee upon discovering Mr GC had not done so. (2) Application of funds received [27] Mr KY submits that following the demand made by the barrister in August 2013 for payment of outstanding fees, his “in...

6. LCRO 32/2025 MT v BR (30 September 2025) [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...bank statement and apparently a partly completed Court submission form (which is not in the materials available to me). [8] The respondent’s submissions were not served on the applicant or her lawyer. The applicant became aware of them after requesting them from the Court following receipt of the Court’s memorandum regarding the outcome of the exemption application two and a half months later. [9] The applicant’s evidence was that, about 10 days after the respondent filed...

7. [2013] NZEmpC 177 Kereru Investments Ltd v Meads [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...$9,175 plus filing fees. The statement of claim was filed by Mr Scott Guthrie who the Authority noted was one of two directors of the plaintiff company. The other was Ms Michelle Guthrie. [2] In a minute dated 27 June 2013, Chief Judge Colgan requested what is commonly referred to as a “good faith report” pursuant to s 181 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). The report was sought on the basis that the determination had recorded a failure by the plaintiff to par...

8. 15 May 2018 Double R Developments Limited v Western Bay of Plenty District Council [pdf, 351 KB]

   ...Management (Forms, Fees and Procedure) Regulations 2003. The time allocated by the Court provides an indication of your potential liability for Court hearing fees in this case. 2 PROCEDURES At the start of the hearing, the Court will consider any requests to: (a) Withdraw proceedings (b) Adjourn (postpone) hearings to a later date (c) Approve settlements agreed to all by the parties The Court will then decide the order in which the proceedings will be heard during the hearing. P...

9. 19 February 2018 Hamilton City Council Road Stopping [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...after that; or • For all other applications, the first half-day is free. After the first half-day there will be a $350 fee for each half-day or part half-day after that. The fees must be pre-paid in accordance with the Resource Management (Forms, Fees and Procedure) Regulations 2003. The time allocated by the Court provides an indication of your potential liability for Court hearing fees in this case. 2 PROCEDURES At the start of the hearing, the Court will consider any r...

10. 17 April 2018 Sabatier Family Trust v Auckland Council and Addison Developments Limited [pdf, 199 KB]

    ...after that; or • For all other applications, the first half-day is free. After the first half-day there will be a $350 fee for each half-day or part half-day after that. The fees must be pre-paid in accordance with the Resource Management (Forms, Fees and Procedure) Regulations 2003. The time allocated by the Court provides an indication of your potential liability for Court hearing fees in this case. 2 PROCEDURES At the start of the hearing, the Court will consider any r...