KT & PD v KI [2024] NZDT 579 (13 August 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]
...when the furniture removal was going on, but he thought that KT and PD had been careless. The puppy had cost $1,500.00, and KI had replaced her with another of the same breed, for the same price. In his view, his loss offset the price of the work performed by the KT and PD. [4] KI said that he would have paid KT and PD $542.00 for their work had it not been for the death of the puppy. The issue [5] The question for me to decide is whether the applicants are entitled to succeed in t...