20321 items matching your search terms
...274 of the Act Between Director-General of Conservation Appellant and Waikato Regional Council Respondent Notice of Genesis Energy Limited’s wish to be party to proceedings 21 September 2020 26537951_2 Form 33 Notice of wish to be party to proceedings 1 To: The Registrar Environment Court Auckland 1. Genesis Energy Limited (Genesis) wishes to be a party to the following proceedings: (a) ENV-2020-AKL-000096 Director-General of...
...assist in providing economic stimulus. (f) The Project has been the subject of numerous public engagement processes and discussions between the Transport Agency and submitters, which has given submitters and the broader public considerable information in relation to the Application. Further, the Application was preceded by a designation process which attracted 742 submissions and was the subject of a two-week council-level hearing in March and April 2019, and three appeals to the...
...June 2020 TIME: 10:00 AM VENUE: Time Allocated: Hearing Room 5 Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre Level 1, 41 Federal Street, Auckland 1 day 1 PROCEDURES At the start of the hearing, the Court will consider any requests to: (a) Withdraw proceedings (b) Adjourn (postpone) hearings to a later date (c) Approve settlements agreed to all by the parties The Court will then decide the order in which the proceedings will be heard during the hearing. Par...
...affidavit of Ms Weeber; (b) affidavit of Dr Rotmann; and (c) affidavit of Mr Shanks. 2. The latter is being, or is to be, filed by counsel for the Surfbreak Protection Society Inc in these proceedings. I understand it may be filed in final form but not yet affirmed, given timing constraints. 3. The affidavits of Ms Weeber and Dr Rotmann have also been filed directly with the Court by the deponents, again, given timing and logistical constraints. It is understood that service...
...suite because the items came together initially as one suite, that is, the same contract. Conclusion 16. For the reasons above, BH Ltd must pay LO $2,700.00. Referee: Ms G Jaduram Date: 5 August 2019 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to ap...
...Act 1988). Presuming the LN was aware of this, I suppose his purpose was not so much about the money as about having his complaints properly heard. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 18 February 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...
...I accept TU Ltd incurred costs to remove the vehicle and that they are entitled to retain the fee. 12. In view of the above, the claim is dismissed. Referee: K Edwards Date: 22 March 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...
...hearing Mr S argued that NB was aware that there were works taking place on the road and had not made a reasonable effort to protect his assets. Mr S pointed out that there were two flyers sent to property owners by Fulton Hogan and Auckland Transport informing them of the work. He also argued that it is common knowledge and NB ought to have been aware that concrete pouring could cause harm, and taken steps to keep his business assets safe. 10. The flyers inform residents that work on...
...are reasonable as they have been approved by an assessor. 11. Accordingly FT is liable for the costs of repairs to HD’s car of $3,883.78. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 20 March 2017 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to apply...
...June 2020; and The claim against IO Ltd is dismissed. The issuing of this order has been delayed as a result of the COVID 19 lockdown. Reasons 1. On 19 August 2019, LC Ltd (‘LC’) entered KM and MM’s property at [Property A], and performed extensive tree pruning (‘pollarding’) on a large [Redacted] tree in their front yard. 2. IO Ltd had engaged LC to work on a tree at the front of [Property B], but LC mistakenly entered the neighbouring property belonging to KM and MM...