Search Results

1. Respond to a charge

   It’s free to respond to a charge. If charges have been laid against you by a Complaints Assessment Committee at the Real Estate Agents Disciplinary Tribunal, you’ll need to fill out a Response to Charge form: Response to charge Appoint someone to act for you You can represent yourself or you can appoint an agent or representative (like a lawyer) to represent you during the charge process. Both you and your representative need to fill out this form: Authority to Act Form 2023 [PDF, 179 K...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Real estate agents >
   3. Apply

2. Court lawyer survey summary of findings [pdf, 469 KB]

   ...14 Number of responses=1297. 7 Figure 6: Reasons for usually going to a counter15 10 6 9 9 10 11 22 25 26 31 63 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Other reasons To obtain directions after a hearing To request a (blank) form To have a document certified To seek procedural advice from the court To seek a decision from a Registrar To view a court file To collect/request a document To advise the court about a case To discuss a case To file an

3. Trustees in the Section 14 Block XIII Tautuku Trust v Cairns - Part Section 3 Block XIII Survey District (2015) 29 Te Waipounamu MB 48 (29 TWP 48) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...of Section 6A Block XIII Tautuku Survey District. These two blocks have the status of General land, and are administered by the Tautuku Waikawa Lands Trust. [7] From 1999-2003, the Heads Block was leased by Richard and Elizabeth Cairns on an informal basis. In 2003 the Cairnses entered two formal lease agreements to lease the Heads Block and the Hayes Block from the relevant trusts. The Yorkes Block was later incorporated into the Hayes Block lease and rent payments were adjusted ac...

4. Body Corporate 180379 v Auckland Council [2013] NZWHT Auckland 6 [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...requires only that the penetration of water has caused damage to the complex (s 16). [9] The unit owners intended to file a multi-unit complex claim. The units were leaking so the common areas process was not available. However on the claim form that was filled out, the box specifying that the claim was a common areas only claim was ticked in error. [10] No one noticed the error and the unit owners and DBH proceeded as if a valid multi-unit claim had been filed. The appr...

5. Wai 2180 Taihape inquiry newsletter 4 Jan 2017 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...week. This process included the completion of the Ngā Kōrero Tuku Iho hearing phase, the close of the research casebook and the completion of the Taihape Statement of Issues. Ngā mihi ki a koutou katoa. Upcoming dates  Witness summaries, requests to cross-examine witnesses with indications, questions of clarification 13 Feb 2017  Tangata whenua briefs of evidence 20 Feb 2017  Witness responses to questions of clarification 27 Feb 2017  Bundles of documents for...

6. [2013] NZEmpC 246 Dunn v Waitemata DHB [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...barrier to his successful occupational rehabilitation, Dr Kenny stated that the major barrier was the current proceedings resulting from the personal grievance and consequent employment mediation. [10] On 19 August 2008, the WDHB wrote to Mr Dunn requesting that he provide notification as to his intention to return to work. Not receiving a reply, the WDHB wrote again to Mr Dunn on 9 September 2008, informing him that if no reply was received, the WDHB would assume that he did not...

7. Mihaka v Housing New Zealand Corporation (Recusal Application) [2017] NZHRRT 7 [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...The relevant paragraphs of the Minute follow: 4 The recusal issue [15] The Minute of 21 June 2016 required any recusal application to be filed by 1 July 2016. As earlier mentioned, no such application has been filed. Instead Mr Mihaka requests further information regarding Mr Shirley: … regarding the involvement of Mr Shirley in both the Act party - such as information regarding his position and beliefs regarding justice and social housing and other policy matters, and als...

8. LCRO 137/2017 and LCRO 33/2018 CH v RB and GN (28 June 2019) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...parties have agreed to the reviews being dealt with on the papers. The reviews have been undertaken on the papers pursuant to s 206(2) of the Act, which allows a Legal Complaints Review Officer (LCRO) to conduct the review on the basis of all information available if the LCRO considers that the review can be adequately determined in the absence of the parties. [31] I record that having carefully read the complaint, the response to the complaint, the Committee’s decisions and th...

9. [2020] NZEmpC 160 Van Kleef v Alliance Group Ltd [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...particulars. Thereafter, I treated the application as being one for further and better disclosure under reg 6 of the Employment Court Regulations 2000. Several categories of documents were sought.2 [4] Alliance did not oppose Ms van Kleef’s requests as recorded at paras 5, 6 and 8 of her application. I directed that disclosure of these documents occur. Mr Smith searched for, and located, a small number of relevant documents, and provided them in accordance with a timetable...

10. LCRO 205/2016 EK v IQ (15 October 2018) [pdf, 169 KB]

    ...legal work to put in place the management structure that Mr EK wished to have his development operate under. [46] Specifically, he says that he wanted to operate his business under the vehicle of a limited partnership, and that Mr IQ himself had informed Mr EK, that he (Mr IQ) had no experience of having set up such a partnership. [47] Mr EK’s concerns were, he says, amplified when he received documentation from Mr IQ. In Mr EK’s opinion, the document received was simply a temp...