Search Results

1. [2016] NZEmpC 87 Kupa v Silver Fern Farms Beef Ltd [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...asked. Secondly, there was a clear process for dealing with the issue; an employee who wished to remove this item of protection was required to ask a supervisor for permission to do so. Approval would be given if the supervisor considered such a request was reasonable. Mr Kupa had not followed this process. It concluded that Mr Kupa’s failure to comply with instructions amounted to serious misconduct which warranted dismissal. Issues [3] Mr Kupa raised a dismissal gr...

2. [2017] NZEmpC 95 Fraser v McDonalds and Doran v Carrick [pdf, 355 KB]

   ...start of work the following day Employees will be rostered according to their availability. No employee will be compelled to work overnight shifts, where their availability does not specify overnight as available. From time to time you may be requested to work hours in addition to [your] work schedule. The Employer recognises that rostering hours is a difficult and contentious issue and will endeavour to ensure restaurant managers are aware of the importance of rostering empl...

3. LCRO 87/2018 QZ v FZB (20 December 2019) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...18 April 2017 from Mr AL of the deed of appointment of trustees, and the authority to uplift, was that he would issue an invoice for his “attendances to date in relation to trust matters”, and when “cleared” would provide the documents requested.13 10 Mr VT's 19 April 2017 invoice: $750 plus GST (total $963.13). 11 Mr QZ's 7 June 2017 invoice: $2,360 plus GST (total, $2,792.20). 12 FZB, letter to Lawyers Complaints Ser...

4. AMLCFT Statutory Review Final Report [pdf, 5.4 MB]

   ...certain that we are addressing most important current risks. In particular, information on money laundering methods is almost a decade old and we cannot fully consider the impact to the risk environment of key changes to the system such as the Phase 2 reforms. There is also a significant risk that the regime participants are failing to combat areas of greatest threat as risks have not been assessed and communicated to agencies or industry. 7. We also consider that the regime is not suff...

5. LCRO 034/2017 TC v DM (30 April 2019) [pdf, 287 KB]

   ...advice concerning the execution of the required documents; (h) Ms DM had made a number of general statements about conveyancing practice that were incorrect; and (i) Ms DM had been uncooperative in providing copies of documents she had been requested to provide. [8] Ms DM responded to Ms TC in a submission which was also distinguished by its comprehensiveness. [9] There was a significant amount of information for the Committee to consider. [10] The Committee approached its inq...

6. [2023] NZEnvC 093 CEP Services Matauwhi Limited v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 7 MB]

   ...of the Act, such order being by consent, rather than representing a decision or determination on the merits pursuant to section 297. The Court understands for present purposes that: (a) all parties to the proceedings have executed the memorandum requesting this order; and (b) all parties are satisfied that all matters proposed for the Court’s endorsement fall within the Court’s jurisdiction, and conform to the relevant requirements and objectives of the Act including, in particula...

7. Far North District Council v Maihi - Okahu 3B2B2 (2014) 91 Taitokerau MB 284 (91 TTK 284) [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ............................................................................................................. [98] Owner support or opposition......................................................................... [105] What type of ahu whenua trust is appropriate? ............................................ [116] Further information required ........................................................................ [124] Guidance for Māori land owners in general and the Council ...........

8. Zhong v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 32 [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...Crowe‟s evidence is based on invasive testing and none of the other experts concur with Dr Walls. Liability for the apron flashing defects [30] The panel of experts was asked to give their opinion on whether the apron flashings were formed correctly, the stage of construction when kick- outs should have been formed and the trade responsible. All experts agreed that the apron flashings were required to be installed with sufficient length to enable a diverter to be craft...

9. [2012] NZEmpC 207 Hutton and Others v Provencocadamus Ltd (in receivership) [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...advising that Ms Makaea (payroll administrator) had taken over responsibility for “processing the 11 Emphasis added. Payroll for all ProvencoCadmus staff effective from 11th August”, and requesting receipt of leave application and Inland Revenue forms (amongst other things). Mr Corrick sent out a further email later that day, having first passed a draft through Mr Gibson. 12 It emphasised that the “ProvencoCadmus” payr...

10. Hutcheson v Houkamau - Porangahau 2B No 10 (2021) 88 Takitimu MB 118 (88 TKT 118) [pdf, 581 KB]

    ...request, provided 22 Taueki v Procter - Horowhenua 11 Lake Block (2020) 415 Aotea MB 1 (415 AOT 1) 23 Hall v Opepe Farm Trust (2010) 19 Waiariki MB 258 (19 WAR 258) 24 Rameka v Hall [2013] NZCA 203 at [93] 88 Tākitimu MB 129 such requests comply with that provision and are not frivolous or vexatious. The applicants say that, prior to March 2018, the trustees regularly sent copies of minutes to beneficiaries. However, the former trustees subsequently decided to send o...