Search Results

1. IS v TM [2023] NZDT 270 (25 May 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...amount of rubbish from the property at her own expense, and had done a significant amount of cleaning, leaving the place tidier than when she moved in. She also argued that she had no obligation to cover the cost of another room, that had belonged to a former flatmate. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 7. I accept that there was no agreement or obligation for IS to contribute to another room that she was not renting. While she did have an obligation to contribute to the clean up p...

2. FX v KQ [2023] NZDT 538 (29 September 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...FX has not been able to prove her claim that KQ gave injectable treatments at the staff discount rate without her authority, FX’s claim must be dismissed. Referee: JF Tunnicliffe Date: 29 September 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

3. N Trust v NE [2023] NZDT 210 (24 May 2023) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...Referee: C Hawes Date: 24 May 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe

4. SN v CU & KU [2023] NZDT 167 (4 May 2023) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...liable to contribute in equal proportions to work on a fence.” 4. The provision of the Act that is relevant is section 10. Under section 10 an occupier who wishes the adjacent occupier to contribute to the fence “shall serve him a notice in form 1 of Schedule 1 or to the like effect.” 5. Where immediate work is not required, section 10(4)(c) states that “in the absence of an agreement to the contrary the occupier of the adjoining land shall not be liable to contribute to t...

5. UW v X Ltd [2022] NZDT 290 (12 December 2022) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...downplay UW’s ability. UW contacted DQ from OQ Ltd when he didn’t get the PG2 licence from X Ltd. DQ viewed footage of UW paragliding and stated that UW could not control forward and reverse inflations sufficiently for a PG2 licence. UW was informed of this. DQ records that UW responded that he would practice. 6. The second instructor that considered UW to be too unsafe to issue a PG2 licence to at the time was OI, [redacted]. She along with three other instructors at Q L...

6. NC & DC v T Ltd & HG [2023] NZDT 222 (19 May 2023) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...NC and DC $3100.25 on or before 5pm on 19 June 2023. 2. HG is struck off this claim. Reasons 1. The first hearing was adjourned. After that hearing, T Ltd and HG contacted the Tribunal and requested that I make a decision based on the information provided in the first hearing and the file. NC and DC agreed to that request. 2. Both parties told me they understood and accepted I would not take into consideration any further evidence or information and there will not be anothe...

7. EI & RA v IL [2023] NZDT 114 (2 March 2023) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...from the collision. The damage is consistent with the nature of the impact and includes repair of the denting and scraping on the left front of IL’s vehicle. Referee: Kaho Date: 2 March 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

8. KQ v UN [2023] NZDT 127 (10 May 2023) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...factor is the respondent’s ‘offer’ of a refund subject to this dog being returned, and re-homed. That is something the applicant rejects (he wants to keep the dog, but get his money back) obviously because of the emotional attachment that has formed. When a good supplied is an animal, the blunt, possibly even harsh, reality is that it is open to the owner of that good to, so to speak, draw a line under the prospect of continuing costs. If an owner of an animal chooses not to do that,...

9. CV v IT [2023] NZDT 185 (31 July 2023) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...the amount that she should have paid to have the cabin built to an acceptable standard. e. IT is not obliged to pay CV. f. CV’s claim is dismissed. Referee: Nicholas Blake Date: 31 July 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

10. ED v UQ [2023] NZDT 305 (19 June 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...in had the representation regarding the horse’s condition been true, she is entitled to claim $2,060.47 in damages. Accordingly, this amount is awarded. Referee: DTR Fuli Date: 19 June 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...