Search Results

1. NI v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 412 (22 April 2024) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...transporting a tractor-style ride-on lawn mower from [City 1] to [City 2]. The dispute arose because the dimensions of the mower given to C Ltd to price the cost of transport were incorrect. There is no suggestion of blame on NI as he had relied on information given to him by the person he purchased the mower from. 2. The effect of the discrepancy in the dimensions meant that rather than being 5.18m3, the mower was actually 13.87m3. This changed the cost of transport from $1,219.00 to...

2. SO v TH [2024] NZDT 536 (25 July 2024) [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...Act and therefore is not inconsistent with section 16(1). Referee: S Simmonds Date: 25 July 2024 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. KT v EG [2024] NZDT 572 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...damages for the failure to return the bond immediately. Conclusion 11. For these reasons EG is to pay KT the sum of $158.00 by the date stated in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 28 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

4. MD v EQ [2024] NZDT 592 (5 September 2024) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...crossing and also riding further from his car (eg 1.5m) the collision would not have occurred, and he would not have sustained damage to his vehicle. 9. Rule 7.2 is a legally bound duty that drivers must follow. The [International driving website] information and the [NZ driving website] information is provided for cyclists to ride more safely but they are not New Zealand law. One might argue it was prudent for MD to be taking account of these safe riding guides, but they are not legall...

5. HT v K Ltd [2024] NZDT 616 (6 September 2024) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...original hearing in the Tribunal, in accordance with the Order of the Disputes Tribunal dated 22 March 2024. No further payment is therefore required. Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 6 September 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

6. QM v DH [2024] NZDT 497 (11 June 2024) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...the court undertake a financial assessment process to determine a weekly instalment amount that DH can realistically afford to pay QM to repay the amount ordered. Referee Perfect Date: 11 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

7. XL v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 466 (7 June 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...actual costs of repairing damage sustained while the truck was hired to XL, even though the truck was hired to multiple other parties before a repair was arranged. Referee Perfect Date: 7 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

8. DF v QT [2024] NZDT 474 (11 June 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...instructed her to obtain a quote to replace the fence. DF obtained a quote from Mr U, a local builder / handyman. The quote was for $7,570.00 to replace the boundary fence between [address 1] and [address 2]. 4. Both parties submitted this information to their insurers. The claims were accepted, and they received payment of $3,785.00 each. 5. Mr U then refused to proceed with the job. In DF’s view, he did so because he realised that he had under-quoted the job. DF suspects t...

9. B Ltd v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 482 (17 May 2024) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...[2024] NZDT 482 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: M Ltd is to pay the sum of $10,863.00 to B Ltd on or before 31 May 2024. Reasons: 1. This dispute arises apparently as a result of email hacking, more formally known as business email compromise (BEC) fraud. On 14 August 2023, B Ltd issued an invoice to M Ltd for $24,725.00 for demolition work, due on 28 August. The invoice was emailed to M Ltd via [accounting software]’s messaging service...

10. TUW & TJW v TX & HL [2024] NZDT 358 (10 May 2024) [pdf, 186 KB]

    ...chattels to go with the property. Both parties agreed the gate was not listed as a chattel. Conclusion 8. For the above reasons, the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Thompson Date: 10 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...