Search Results

1. WHT - Chair's directions for multi unit claims [pdf, 207 KB]

   ... A direction to attend the preliminary conference  A requirement to confirm in writing whether they are intending to file a claim with the Tribunal and if so when it is likely to be filed. If they are intending to delay filing they will be requested to provide the reasons for the proposed delay.  Notification that if they are wishing to proceed to adjudication their claim will be consolidated with the other claim/s already filed unless leave of the Weathertight Homes Tribu...

2. [2009] NZEmpC CC 4/09 Benson v Air Nelson Ltd [pdf, 48 KB]

   ...17 April 2008). Mr Benson challenged that determination and the matter proceeded before the Court by way of a hearing de novo. Throughout the personal grievance process, the primary remedy sought by Mr Benson was reinstatement to his former position. [4] I was told by counsel that the evidence provided to the Court was essentially identical to that provided to the Authority. This comprised the evidence of seven witnesses for the plaintiff and four witnesses for the defe...

3. Morpeth v Ramsey LCRO 110 / 2009 (12 November 2009) [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...was the Police. At a later date Mr Morpeth called Immigration New Zealand again. The file note of that conversation records: Further phone call from Michael Morpeth to advise that the police had arrested him [Ramsey] and he was in custody. He requested that I talked to the Police regarding INZ case and bail application. [5] Mr Morpeth was informed that the complaint had been made by a letter from the New Zealand Law Society of 16 October 2008. He responded very briefly by letter...

4. WHT Claims for a multi unit - Chair's Directions [pdf, 207 KB]

   ... A direction to attend the preliminary conference  A requirement to confirm in writing whether they are intending to file a claim with the Tribunal and if so when it is likely to be filed. If they are intending to delay filing they will be requested to provide the reasons for the proposed delay.  Notification that if they are wishing to proceed to adjudication their claim will be consolidated with the other claim/s already filed unless leave of the Weathertight Homes Tribu...

5. Chalecki v ACC [2012] NZACA 15 [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...requirements. The appellant could not resume his outside employment as a carpenter, he had no qualifications and after applying unsuccessfully for other jobs, he decided to build up his farm so as to be able to become fully self-employed. [11] The form the Corporation sent the appellant to fill in for the purpose of seeking employment dated 17 December 1987, records the appellant’s intention to build up his farm work. The Corporation treated this as an application for a self...

6. McGeorge v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 48 (30 August 2012) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...the information held at that point by the Tribunal. http://www.iaa.govt.nz/ 5 [39] The Minute made it clear to the parties that they could provide further information which would be considered by the Tribunal. [40] The Minute also requested further information from Mr Standing, and put him on notice that any response should take account of the fact he was facing multiple complaints, some of which had strikingly similar components. [41] The Minute explained to Mr Standin...

7. NE v RL LCRO 88/2013 (27 February 2015) [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...on to Mr NE. it appears Ms RL may not have realised at that time that neither she, nor Mr NE, received a copy of all the documentation…. (Ms RL’s emphasis) [18] Ms RL says that she promptly identified that documents were missing so she requested copies from opposing counsel by email, and supplied copies of the relevant emails. She also said: It was not initially intended that the records were to be passed on to Mr NE. They were to be passed directly to the expert. We refer...

8. BD v EG LCRO 374/2013 & 376/2013 (30 November 2015) [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...accepted that offer and this acceptance has been communicated via Mr FI after Mr FI has fully advised Mrs BD regarding the financial details of the sale including the various claims and payments necessary for the trust to be made and settled. As requested I hereby undertake as the Solicitor for the family trust regarding the sale, that on completion of settlement from the sale proceeds the sum of $50,000.00 should be held for the benefit of the trust to be formed on behalf of Mrs BD a...

9. BAB v PW LCRO 4 / 2011 (14 August 2012) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...that role. [34] However, there is a threshold below which a lawyer should not assist in interfering with the rights of others. That is the purpose of the Rule. A lawyer must be able to point to an assessment of the grounds on which he or she formed the view that a caveatable interest existed. The Standards Committee must consider this reasoning and form a view as to the merits of that decision. Otherwise the Rule would have no relevance or substance in these circumstances. [35]...

10. [2018] NZEnvC 107 Handley v South Taranaki District Council [pdf, 3.6 MB]

    ...differences pertaining to permissible and appropriate designation conditions. Mediation before an Environment Commissioner was unsuccessful and the appeal was set down for a hearing. [4] During the week prior to the scheduled hearing , the parties requested a Judicial Settlement Conference ('JSC'). This was proposed on a basis whereby the JSC would proceed on the first scheduled hearing day, with the matter then being heard on subsequent scheduled days if settlement was no...