Search Results

1. BL & DL v L Ltd & V Ltd [2023] NZDT 304 (9 August 2023) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...defect so that it is not of acceptable quality and accordingly they are not entitled to return the umbrella and be refunded the purchase price. Referee: K Cowie DTR Date: 9 August 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

2. BP v G Ltd [2023] NZDT 38 (20 January 2023) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...September. 7. BP was without his luggage for 8 days. 8. BP was booked to do a ‘hiking tour’ of the Amalfi Coast. The provider was FX, a [Country] based travel company. 9. BP submitted that upon arrival he was not given the necessary information about the first day of the hiking tour. This meant that he missed the first day of the tour. 10. BP is a photographer. One of the purposes of his trip was to take photographs, which he offers for sale in his website. BP’s camera...

3. EB v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 77 (21 February 2023) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...discussion in the hearing about what BZ had said to EB. BZ, of course, was the builder doing the work, and it was not his job to price work, or to deal with contract variations. If an alteration was to be made to the original contract specifications, information about any increase of price for that should have been given directly to EB from U Ltd itself, or from the quantity surveyor. I accept that no one from U Ltd spoke directly to EB about the increased price for breaker boards, and th...

4. KN v XD Inc [2024] NZDT 131 (4 March 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...the above reasons XD Inc is to pay $395.00 to KN before 4 April 2024, and also to provide him with a parlour case that is in good condition before the same date. Referee: L Thompson Date: 4 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

5. NB & QD v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 722 (18 December 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...evidence that the sub-contractors were trustworthy people, or at least H Ltd had no reason to doubt any of them. I also find that as far as Mr H was aware the house was vacant, and there was nothing in the house to steal in any event. He was not informed by the Applicants that they had placed any item in the house, and while the work had probably been completed by that time, because of the time of the year (it was CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 January) and because H Ltd appeare...

6. MK & NK v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 687 (21 December 2023) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...pass those on to his tenants in plenty of time. 10. NK denies that he was ever told that the building would need to be vacant and points out that it is not written on the quotation nor is there any evidence of such a requirement in writing in any form — some of the communication between the parties was by phone and some was by email — I accept that none of the email communication makes reference to the building needing to be empty while work is proceeding. One of his tenants has wri...

7. OL v CD Ltd [2023] NZDT 711 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...refund on the third scooter. Given the de minus amount, and the absence of any independent evidence, I make no finding on this part of the application. Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 19 December 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

8. M Ltd v ON [2023] NZDT 389 (21 September 2023) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...XC in a document dated 9 May 2022. The digger remained in N Ltd’s possession while it sourced parts, and eventually repair work was completed. N Ltd’s total invoice, dated 9 May 2023, was for $6,354.30. XC had contacted ON on 16 March 2023 to inform him that defects had been found in the digger, and had requested a contribution to the cost of repairing them. [4] XC said that he had not expected to pay so much to N Ltd, but the costs had increased as N Ltd had found problems with the...

9. EC & KC v CT & ZR [2022] NZDT 190 (17 October 2022) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...settlement and after 2 contractors had intervened. 30. Accordingly, the Tribunal finds that the claim has not been proven and must be dismissed. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 17 October 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...

10. BM & OT v OE & DE [2023] NZDT 459 (5 July 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

    ...remained the owners of this property they would have incurred this repair cost themselves. 17. Finally, my apologises to both parties for the time it has taken to issue this decision. Referee: A Hayes Date: 5/7/23 Information for Parties Page 4 of 4 Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you...