Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 110 Western Bay of Plenty District Council v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...about how best to proceed with reviewing the entry in Schedule 3 to the RCEP for ONFL 5 (Matakana Sand Barrier). The Respondent advised that each party would develop a written proposal based on the interim decision. Those proposals would then inform a meeting of the parties at which they would endeavour to settle on common wording for the entry and, to the extent that agreement could not be reached, identify the matters of disagreement in terms that could be referred back to the Cou...

2. LCRO 47/2024 OZ v HD (22 November 2024) [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...4 [22] In April 2020, the applicant’s barrister provided a copy of the Trust A trust deed (among other documents) to the husband’s barrister as part of disclosure under the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (the PRA). In doing so, she informed him that the husband had been excluded by deed as a discretionary beneficiary of Trust A in November 2019. [23] In October 2020, the applicant’s solicitors in the relationship property negotiations uplifted the applicant’s deeds from

3. [2010] NZEmpC 131 Rooney Earthmoving Ltd v McTague & Ors [pdf, 25 KB]

   ...relation to a freezing order, which requires BMW to provide monthly statements to solicitors, counsel and the financial experts but which are not to be disclosed to any other person. There has been an exchange of lists of documents in a limited form, but the action in the High Court is now stayed. [7] Ms Dalziel noted that the High Court proceedings are tortious in nature and this has changed the litigation significantly and may have also impacted upon the discovery exercise....

4. [2012] NZEmpC 130 CPC (New Zealand) Ltd v Dunlop [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...satisfy us that they were not breaching the terms of our employment agreement and our arrangements for a friendly exit. ... Therefore all the time and cost incurred for John [Tannahill] is a direct result of the other party’s failure to provide information as requested, and of course a function of their attempt to succeed with a substantial alternative claim. [7] Mr Parbhu also made a number of other allegations against Mr Dunlop and his counsel, Mr Tannahill, and he attached t...

5. Ram v Aasa [2016] NZIACDT 9 (04 February 2016) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...timely updates (clause 3(a) of the 2010 Code). [6.8.3] Failing to confirm in writing when she ceased working part way through the immigration process (clause 3(b) of the 2010 Code). [6.8.4] Failing to return passports and other personal documents, on request, and without delay in a secure manner (clause 1.3(b) of the 2010 Code). The responses [7] Neither Ms Aasa nor the complainant responded to the statement of complaint. The standard notice to the parties does not require a response...

6. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v CAL2013-E000737 [2013] NZCOP 16 [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...initial detection notice, issued on 18 September 2012; [b] a warning notice, issued on 19 November 2012; and [c] an enforcement notice, issued on 18 February 2013. [7] The Application, together with detailed submissions and an authorisation of agent form, was filed with the Tribunal on 22 March 2013. The Applicant sought an award of $543.42, including a deterrent sum of $250. [8] On 10 April 2013, the Tribunal wrote to the Respondent, sending to him a copy of the Application and a...

7. Mr C 23 June 2015 NZSHD 5 [pdf, 42 KB]

   ...clearly indicate that the applicant is not a fit and proper person to hold a certificate. [13] A copy of the Police Objection was sent to the applicant on 25 May 2015. At the same time he was advised of his options which included the possibility of requesting a ‘Hearing in Person’ (hearing) of his case under s.26 of the Act or making written submissions in support of his application. [14] The applicant responded by email on 27 May 2015 requesting a hearing. [15] When advised by...

8. Kahukura v Moore – Manukōrihi 1B Section 2 (2013) 299 Aotea MB 153 (299 AOT 153) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...and their 12 children were named as the remainder persons. Procedural history [8] The application was first heard before Judge Reeves on 24 February 2012.4 [9] The matter was then set down to be heard on 22 June 2012 me. The applicant requested an adjournment to seek legal advice and to make sure that all the beneficiaries were informed. The respondent spoke in opposition to the application. Judge Reeves raised the possibility of establishing an ahu whenua trust over the bl...

9. AP v Standards Committee X LCRO 317 / 2012 (15 August 2013) [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...of misconduct, a finding that only the Tribunal could make, and also noting that the Applicant had failed to respond or comply with a requirement pursuant to s 147(2)(a) to produce for the Committee’s inspection certain documents that had been requested. Review application [11] The grounds cited by the Applicant for review were bias, procedural unfairness, error in fact and law, wrong in determining the matter reached the necessary threshold of the New Zealand Law Society Discip...

10. 2017 NZSSAA 042 (24 July 2017) [pdf, 107 KB]

    ...submissions by 9 November 2016 in response to the Ministry’s Section 12K Report and supplementary report filed on 5 August 2016. 2 [5] On 22 November 2016 the case manager wrote to Ms XXXX noting that she had not provided the submissions requested by the Authority and advised Ms XXXX that if her submissions were not filed by Tuesday 29 November 2016 the matter would be determined. [6] On 29 November 2016 the Authority received an e-mail from Peter Eastgate, coun...