BD v SL [2023] NZDT 6 (7 February 2023) [pdf, 109 KB]
...basis of an error made in the advised height of the colt. 2. BD filed a claim seeking the final payment of $500.00. 3. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Was a misrepresentation made about the height of the colt? (b) If so, did this information encourage the purchase? (c) Did the loss equal or exceed $500.00? Was a misrepresentation made about the height of the colt? 4. I find that BD inadvertently misrepresented the height of the colt. I have reached this conclusion...