Search Results

1. TC v NU [2023] NZDT 707 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...[13] I have not allowed the cost of the Disputes Tribunal filing fee. The Tribunal’s very limited jurisdiction to award costs does not include that fee. Referee: C Hawes Date: 19 December 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

2. OT v KC & ZX [2023] NZDT 693 (14 December 2023) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...discovered the camera was not in the box, but another item was. 3. OT seeks $330.00 the amount paid for the camera and its postage. 4. In the process of KC being served the claim, ZX contacted the Tribunal identifying himself as the son of KC. He informed that KC had died and produced a death certificate. He further informed the Tribunal that he was the person that had completed the camera auction on [the online platform] using his mother’s account. He is the identifiable and connect...

3. SD v W Ltd & X Ltd [2023] NZDT 407 (22 August 2023) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...these reasons I find the correct respondent to this claim is X Ltd. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Is X Ltd in breach of its obligations to refund SD? 6. The relevant law is the law of contract. In this situation the contract was formed between SD (through his agent, [Travel Agent]) and X Ltd by way of the purchase of airline tickets. 7. SD states he outlaid $2231.75 for return flights from [City 2] to [Country]; leaving [City 2] 2 May 2020 and returning 8 May 202...

4. Q Ltd v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 438 (11 July 2023) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...from UE on 9 January 2023 arranging for the two course enrolments. E-mail confirmation of the enrolments was sent to UE's personal e-mail address. 6. On the morning of the courses, being 10 January 2023, UE and MX completed Learner Enrolment Forms which on the second page have space for details about who is paying the bill. 7. Both UE and MX ticked “company account”. UE provided the name “[B Ltd]” and EU provided the name “[B Ltd]” and gave an e-mail address for t...

5. XD v G Ltd [2023] NZDT 432 (23 August 2023) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...recall there are customer satisfaction programs in which they have been replaced free of charge for customers. 8. ND acknowledged that there had been issues with tip corrosion when the engines were not run long enough to heat up, so condensation formed. He said that there was a program for replacing them in [Continent], but not in New Zealand. Even if there were such a program, it is not proven that XD’s would be entitled to have his vehicle fixed under it. There is no contract betwe...

6. IU Ltd v NO [2023] NZDT 409 (26 July 2023) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...after filing, which at 2% per month would be a windfall for the Applicant’s delay. 17. The Tribunal finds that the Respondent owes the Applicant $4,016.55. Referee: L Mueller Date: 26 July 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

7. SE v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 456 (17 August 2023) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...refused to return her bond. In an email dated 28 March 2023 it stated: As per our emails, I have advised that any outstanding bond has been forfeited. From record [sic], you went on holiday for a month and never returned to the club, nor was any formal resignation sent in. Is SE entitled to her bond back? 10. The law of contract applies. D Ltd has alleged that SE breached the terms of the contract by going on holiday for a month and not formally resigning. 11. It is clear from...

8. KL v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 92 (1 February 2024) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...description). 11. Because I am unable to find any breach of the guarantees in the CGA, the claim is dismissed. It is not necessary to consider the second issue. Referee: M Wilson Date: 1 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

9. CG & NA v YA [2024] NZDT 695 (9 September 2024) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...well as provide general support for the mother. YA was to be paid $380 per day for the ‘maternity matron’ services. 2. The agreement was for YA to provide the ‘maternity matron’ service 24 hours a day. However, due to family issues YA informed CG and NA she could no longer do the night shift or start on the day agreed. 3. CG and NA claim YA breached the contract and claim in the Disputes Tribunal for the refund of the bond, postpartum meal costs incurred and the Tribunal fi...

10. IG Ltd v IX Ltd [2023] NZDT 390 (29 August 2023) [pdf, 94 KB]

    ...November 2022. 8) It follows that the respondent, will, with respect to the 2 invoices in question, need to pursue remedies against DX. Referee: G.P.Rossiter Date: 29 August 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...