Search Results

1. Pomare v Pomare - Hongoeka 1B Parts and Hongoeka 1B1 (2024) 492 Aotea MB 5 (492 AOT 5) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...estate of Sir Māui Pōmare (the Estate). The applications arise, in part, from a wish for proper administration, and, in part, due to a stalemate amongst Sir Māui’s descendants over the occupation of two houses on one of the land blocks that form part of his estate. This is the Hongoeka 1B Parts and Hongoeka 1B1 block (the 1B block). [2] The first application is made by Toarangatira Apira Woodbine Pōmare (Toa), Hana Pōmare, James Wirihana Rangihaeata and Shane Paul Rangihaeat...

2. [2010] NZEmpC 108 MacBeth v Cookie Time Limited [pdf, 22 KB]

   ...This should be in the form of a list of appropriately described categories of documents. Those lists are to be provided within 14 days after the provision of further particulars by the plaintiff. [6] Each party is to respond to the other party’s request for discovery by providing a list of documents in the form commonly used in High Court civil proceedings. I note that the range of documents potentially relevant to the matters at issue in this proceeding may include documents held by...

3. [2015] NZSSAA 98 (11 December 2015) [pdf, 32 KB]

   ...lump sum had been paid to her as a result of not claiming for the United Kingdom pension from age 60. The lump sum payment was also paid into the Special Banking Option account on 15 April 2014. The appellant contacted the Ministry about this and requested that the money be paid into her personal bank account. The amount of the lump sum was £553.89 or NZ$1,066.49. [6] The Chief Executive made a decision to deduct the amount of the lump sum payment from one fortnightly payment of New...

4. AK v ZP LCRO 104 / 2010 (10 February 2011) [pdf, 60 KB]

   ...by the Legal Services Agency, and that compensation in the sum of $50,000 should be paid to him for hardship, humiliation and time wasting. The Standards Committee Decision [8] The Standards Committee considered all of the material before it and formed the view that the complaint did not raise any professional standards issues. [9] The material considered by the Committee included the complaint, the Practitioner’s response and further comments by the Applicant. [10] As a result...

5. Pole v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 76 (26 August 2014) [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...Tangilanu lodged the applications for work visas under section 61 of the Immigration Act. At this time, Immigration New Zealand was dealing with the residence application referred back by the Residence Review Board. Immigration New Zealand sent written requests to Ms Tangilanu seeking further documents on 7 July, 28 July and 4 August 2011 and gave a final deadline of 10 August 2011 to provide the information requested. Ms Tangilanu did not provide the information to Immigration New Zealan...

6. ENV-2016-AKL-000TBA Vector Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 381 KB]

   ...However, to the extent that the Council is concerned with the location of such stations, the establishment of any electric vehicle charging station requires approval from Auckland Transport as road controlling authority through the Corridor Access Request process under the Auckland Transport Code of Practice. 2 Policies 83.4.2(1) and (2). Decisions Report, 19 August 2016, paragraph 32.2(d). 3166006 18. This was recognised in the Panel's Recommendation, which states: ......

7. Wellington Standards Committee v Pine [2015] NZLCDT 24 [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...name of another firm of solicitors to appear on the GFT deed when he knew that the firm had not acted in relation to, and were not otherwise connected with, the preparation of the GFT deed; (d) Allowed Mr G to sign two Authority & Instruction forms for an electronic transaction for Mrs G without adequately verifying that Mrs G had authorised him to do so under an Enduring Power of Attorney; (e) Fabricated witness details on the two Authority & Instruction forms referred t...

8. [2018] NZEmpC 82 Ovation NZ Ltd v The NZ Meat Workers Union & Anor [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...defendant contends that its members who are piece rate workers are not being provided with paid rest breaks, in contravention of s 69ZD of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act).2 The defendant pleads that the plaintiffs require work to be performed during breaks in the form of “doffing and stowing and sterilising equipment and gear and donning such equipment and gear for use”. The parties have referred to this matter as the “donning and doffing issue”. [5] That alle...

9. [2018] NZEnvC 103 Handley v South Taranaki District Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...for the regulatory authorities' Date of Decision: 26 June 2018 Date of Issue: 29 June 2018 RECORD OF SECOND ORAL INTERIM DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: Appeal allowed in part. B: Directions are made as to the filing of the final form of modified requirement for confirmation by final decision. C: There is no order as to costs on the agreed basis that costs lie where they fall. HANDLEY v STDC - SECOND ORAL DECISION Background 2 REASONS [1] This morning, the c...

10. Nerai - Ototoika A5B (2002) 119 Otorohanga MB 168 (119 OT 168) [pdf, 950 KB]

    ...until 31 October 2001. Rent was paid to the Maori Trustee and distributed to the owners annually. She could see little need to call meetings and these would only result in costs being incurred. Claims were made that the trustees had not heeded requests to call meetings. Enid Tata denied that any requests have been made of her to call meetings. I am not therefore able to rule as to whether or not any such requests had been made but it did appear that requests had been made to Alan...