KM v LK [2023] NZDT 255 (28 June 2023) [pdf, 96 KB]
...the parties also discussed this at the makeup trial that LK did for KM before she went away to [country]. 13. LK organised a replacement makeup artist for the wedding, and so KM was not entitled to a refund under the contract. 14. While the formal cancellation came from LK, this was clearly in response to KM’s repeated statements that she was unhappy with the replacement offered and requests for a refund. KM’s emails and texts made it clear she did not want the replacement make...