Search Results

Search results for forms.

20047 items matching your search terms

  1. Genesis Energy Limited 101 [pdf, 104 KB]

    ...Between Auckland/Waikato and Eastern Fish and Game Councils Appellant and Waikato Regional Council Respondent Notice of Genesis Energy Limited’s wish to be party to proceedings 21 September 2020 26546441_2 Form 33 Notice of wish to be party to proceedings 1 To: The Registrar Environment Court Auckland 1. Genesis Energy Limited (Genesis) wishes to be a party to the following proceedings: (a) ENV-2020-AKL-000101 Auckland/Waikato and E...

  2. O'Hagan v Police (Costs) [2020] NZHRRT 28 [pdf, 614 KB]

    ...these proceedings Mr O’Hagan alleged the Police did not respond to his IPP 6 request within the 20 working day timeframe allowed by the Privacy Act 1993 (PA), s 40. The Police have always admitted this breach and made apology when providing the requested information 18 days outside the 20 working day limit. In the decision delivered by the Tribunal as O’Hagan v Police [2020] NZHRRT 22 at [45] the Tribunal held that this apology was genuine. [2] Mr O’Hagan sought the maximum sum o...

  3. [2021] NZEnvC 177 Campbell's Block Limited v Southland Regional Council [pdf, 160 KB]

    ...filed primary submissions on the proposed rules relating to Intensive Winter Grazing (‘IWG’) in the proposed Southland Water and Land Plan (‘pSWLP’). (b) The Wilkins’ submission raised concerns with the IWG controls in the pSWLP and requested a number of amendments to the notified rules. Its submission requested the removal of any restriction on the maximum hectares of IWG per farm, suggested a percentage control, if used, of 30- 40% of total landholding and requested an...

  4. BU v SI Ltd [2015] NZDT 1460 (10 September 2015) [pdf, 183 KB]

    ...in this claim were innocent victims, and I note that the Land Rover only had third party insurance, so SI Ltd has had to bear the loss of its own vehicle. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 10 September 2015 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to apply...

  5. [2021] NZEnvC 197 James Wallace Family Trust v Wang [pdf, 146 KB]

    ...otherwise comply with the rules of the Auckland Unitary Plan: Operative in Part (AUP) applying to the Site. 2. The Respondent is to undertake by 31 March 2022 restoration/remedial works that will return the carport to its existing consented use and form. B. These orders do not remove the need to comply with all other applicable legislation and rules of law, including the Building Act 2004. C. There is no order for costs. REASONS Introduction James Richard Wallace, Bruce John...

  6. ZG Ltd v KJ Ltd [2020] NZDT 1386 (4 March 2020) [pdf, 188 KB]

    ...confirmed that KJL had ordered the wrong Theme and that ZGL had paid them for it. Accordingly, KJL must refund that amount ($270.95) to ZGL. Referee: Ms G Jaduram Date: 4 March 2020 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

  7. [2021] NZSSAA 3 (2 March 2021) [pdf, 134 KB]

    ...since the age of 50, five of those years being over the age of 50. He indicated that he usually lived in New Zealand and intends to stay here, and that he had not lived in any other country except the Cook Islands. 2 [3] The Ministry requested a travel movements report from Immigration New Zealand and on the basis of that report decided that the appellant met the five years requirement for residency since turning 50 years but did not meet the requirement for ten years

  8. ET v MC & DC [2022] NZDT 119 (5 August 2022) [pdf, 200 KB]

    ...of the existing fence. MC and DC failed to object to his taking that action therefore they can be regarded as having given tacit approval to his proposed actions. 10. I find MC and DC’s failure to respond to that notice as not amounting to any form of approval or consent. They had issued a cross notice objecting to a new fence so that was their last word on the matter. They did not need to keep objecting no matter how many notices were served thereafter. 11. Adequacy of existing...

  9. KQ v HDC Ltd [2022] NZDT 153 (28 September 2022) [pdf, 96 KB]

    ...the car might have been worth about $4,000.00 at the most, but when I looked at similar cars for sale on the internet, I am of the view that $2,500.00 is more appropriate. 14. I am also satisfied that KQ had some other foreseeable losses in the form of the cost to him of using another vehicle which belonged to his mother. I am satisfied that KQ can claim $100.00 in respect of that matter. 15. The Respondents are jointly and severally liable to pay the total sum of $2,600.00. Refe...

  10. EL v BN [2022] NZDT 156 (23 September 2022) [pdf, 212 KB]

    ...payment (with the law firm that holds the house settlement money currently), I reflect that agreement by ordering that BN is to pay $1040.00 directly to EL. Referee Perfect Date: 23 September 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...