LCRO 204/2021 UX v AK (28 April 2022) [pdf, 162 KB]
...were residing in and wanted the accommodation to be “checked out”; and (b) at the time Ms QE raised these concerns, Mrs AK’s husband was working at a location close to Mr UX’s home; and 3 (c) she had obtained instructions from Ms QE to request her (Mrs AK’s) husband to take a photo of Mr UX’s property from the road; and (d) whilst it was not usual practice for her to ask her husband to become involved in any matters concerning one of her clients, on this occasion it...