Search Results

1. OIA-122506.pdf [pdf, 787 KB]

   Legal Services Commissioner Justice Centre I 19 Aitken Street I DX SX10125 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 I F 04 918 8820 lsc@justice.govt.nz 25 June 2025 Ref: OIA 122506 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Luca Fairgray appeals Thank you for your email of 24 May 2025, requesting under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding the cost of Luca Fairgray’s appeals. Specifically, you have requested: Please provide me with the OIA response given to...

2. OIA-Government target 4 [pdf, 203 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 16 October 2024 Our ref: OIA 116221 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Government target 4 Thank you for your email of 6 September 2024 to the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information on the Government Targets. Specifically, you requested: �...

3. Criminal record check

   Criminal record check timeframes Requests for criminal record checks are managed in accordance with Schedule 4 of the Privacy Act 2020 (the Act). We endeavour to respond to all requests within 20 working days. Around 90% of requests are responded to in less than one week. However, some requests will need to be assessed by a staff member to ensure the privacy of the individual is protected. We may also need to contact you for more information in order to process your request. In these cases, it m...

4. Holmes v Commissioner of Police [2012] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...Mr Holmes in person Ms A Russell and Mr R Moran for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 30 November 2011 and 1 December 2011 DATE OF DECISION: 31 July 2012 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL Introduction [1] By letter dated 30 September 2008 Mr Holmes requested access to the personal information held about him by the New Zealand Police in relation to the alleged theft of money from an ANZ Bank ATM machine. The Police did not respond to that request within the 20 working day period stipulate...

5. AI v ZO LCRO 215 / 2011 (21 June 2013) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...against law practitioner Mr ZO (the Practitioner). Mr AI sought a review of the Committee’s decision. [2] An Applicant-only hearing was scheduled. This type of hearing may be scheduled where it appears from the existing file that all information necessary for the review is already available, but can also show whether further enquiry is needed. In this case Mr AI attended, accompanied by his wife and a relative who attended in support. The Practitioner had an opportunity to

6. LCRO 101/2019 YK v RN (17 March 2020) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...consequences that could follow if the vendor was not prepared to agree to extending the time for fulfilling the conditions in the contract. [39] It is clear that Ms YK was having difficulty satisfying the insurance conditions. [40] The extension requested on 15 August was the third sought. [41] The first request for an extension was made on 13 August 2018. The second on 14 August 2018. [42] When Ms RN received instructions to seek a further extension, those instructions were promp...

7. Needham v Accident Compensation Corporation (Binding effect of review decision) [2023] NZACC 146 [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...cover for an infection following hip replacement surgery on 10 August 2012. The date of the treatment injury is 21 August 2014, which is the date that Mrs Needham sought treatment for the symptoms of the treatment injury. [7] In 2015, Mrs Needham requested ACC funded assistance for the boiler system at her home. In her letter of 20 July 2015, she said she was unable to lift the 20 kilogram bags of wood pellets up to chest height to load into the hopper. She said that the costs of...

8. Rafiq v Civil Aviation Authority [2013] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...models of clarity and are difficult to follow. They have been understood as making complaints that the defendants breached: [2.1] Principle 6 of the information privacy principles in that the defendants wrongly refused access to personal information requested by Mr Rafiq (HRRT040/2011). [2.2] Principles 1-4 and Principle 11 in that the investigations into whether Mr Rafiq was a fit and proper person to hold a pilot licence and whether he had committed offences under the Civil Aviation...

9. IPT Practice Note 3/2023 Residence [pdf, 397 KB]

   ...1. COMMENCEMENT PRELIMINARY MATTERS 2. JURISDICTION 3. NOTICE OF APPEAL 4. REPRESENTATION 5. CONTACT ADDRESS 6. FAMILY APPEALS AND CHILDREN 7. NEEDS OF APPELLANTS 8. VICTIMS’ SUBMISSIONS 9. OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT AND PRIVACY ACT REQUESTS 10. ORDER OF DETERMINATION AND REQUESTS FOR PRIORITY 11. SUBMISSIONS AND EVIDENCE 11A. SUBMISSIONS AND EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY THE APPELLANT 11B. EVIDENCE GATHERED BY THE TRIBUNAL 11C. SUBMISSIONS AND EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY THE RES...

10. ENVC-38 application for waiver or directions [docx, 13 KB]

    Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Procedure) Regulations 2003 (as at 03 March 2015) Form 38 Application for waiver or directions Section 281, Resource Management Act 1991 To the Registrar Environment Court Auckland, Wellington, and Christchurch I, [full name], apply for a waiver (or directions) in the following proceedings: [state— · the Environment Court's reference number for the proceedings (eg, RMA 232/98); or · the parties to the proceedings and the nature of the proceedings...