Search Results

1. ENV-2017-AKL-000156 C N Barbour Family Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...Independent Hearing Panel failed to identify the impacts of the revised precinct plan beyond the Precinct boundary, and the decision has effectively pre-empted the public consultation and submission process, and analysis, that was intended to inform the final alignment and classification. The new alignment has an immediate and direct impact on the underlying zoning pattern, as the arterial roads form logical zone boundaries within the precinct. (h) The amended alignment and clas...

2. [2019] NZEnvC 193 West Coast Regional Council v Westland District Council [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...qualified technical persons giving reasons for the non-completion and any impact this may have on the Key Milestones for the Project Works and on these Orders. The Key Milestones are defined in Order B and are marked Attachment A, attaching to and forming part of these Orders. At the same time as giving notice to the West Coast Regional Council, Westland District Council shall provide a copy of the notice, together with the technical reports, to the court; (d) within ten working...

3. 2024 NZPSPLA 078.pdf [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...of Andrea Smedley. Her COA was granted on 30 April 2024. • In her application for a COA Ms Baker wrongly declared she had no convictions. In addition, she did not include all the names by which she has been known. She has since provided this information to the Authority. • Ms Baker is not an employee of South Security but is engaged by them through her company Work from Z Marketing Limited. [3] Ms Baker advises she works as a lead generator at South Security. She says she

4. [2024] NZEnvC 150 Kaiuma Farm Limited v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 395 KB]

   ...and of the discharges, including into the Coastal Marine Area (‘CMA’). [11] That evidence, which we emphasise has not yet been filed with the court, could raise the question of whether the discharge permit application ought to have had some form of notification. At this juncture there has been no kind of notification decision at all in relation to that application. [12] Marberry’s decision to make a fresh application ahead of this decision, 4 which will now have to be t...

5. LCRO 250+251/2016 MJY and VYW v WLB, WLB v MJY and VYW (21 September 2018) [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...Introduction [1] Following complaints by Mr MJY and Mrs VYW, [Area] Standards Committee [X] made four findings of unsatisfactory conduct against Mr WLB and ordered him to: (a) reduce his fees; 2 (b) provide an Authority and Instruction form to enable the property owned by the Trust to be transferred to new trustees; (c) apologise to Mr MJY and Mrs VYW; (d) pay a fine of $3,000; and (e) pay costs in the sum of $2,000. [2] Mr MJY and Mrs VYW, and Mr WLB, have all applied...

6. LCRO 251+250/2016 MJY and VYW v WLB, WLB v MJY and VYW (21 September 2018) [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...Introduction [1] Following complaints by Mr MJY and Mrs VYW, [Area] Standards Committee [X] made four findings of unsatisfactory conduct against Mr WLB and ordered him to: (a) reduce his fees; 2 (b) provide an Authority and Instruction form to enable the property owned by the Trust to be transferred to new trustees; (c) apologise to Mr MJY and Mrs VYW; (d) pay a fine of $3,000; and (e) pay costs in the sum of $2,000. [2] Mr MJY and Mrs VYW, and Mr WLB, have all applied...

7. Tito - Mangakahia 2B2 No 2A1A (2021) 227 Taitokerau MB 188 (227 TTK 188) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...filed with the Māori Appellate Court (A20170002696), which was dismissed on 29 September 2017. On 14 January 2020 the Chief Judge ordered the Injunction Order to be transmitted to the High Court for enforcement. Kevin Tito has now filed papers requesting a stay or dismissal of the injunction application ordered on 31 January 2017. The lower Court decision issued by His Honour Judge Armstrong has been dealt with through the dismissal of the appeal. There is no further recourse th...

8. E69 Philip Brown - Planning - EIC - Sanford Ltd [pdf, 848 KB]

   ...applications if, as a minimum, the attached conditions (or conditions to the same effect) form part of any consent the Court is minded to grant. I understand that Panuku has agreed to the imposition of these conditions by the Court, and will be requesting the Court do so in its rebuttal evidence. Philip Brown 21 August 2018 2181 - 17 - DS-002313-210-103-V3 ANNEXURE A – AGREED CONDITIONS Removal of Structures / Reinstatement ... 8A. No later than two months aft...

9. Parininihi Ki Waitotara Incorporation- Section 53 Block IX, Opunake Survey District (2005) 159 Aotea MB 146 (159 AOT 146) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...PKW seeks a change of status to a block of land it owns from Maori freehold to General land. The purpose of the status change is to enable PKW to sell the land to a Mr Bryan and Mrs Christine Roach, the current lessees. The Roachs made a formal request to acquire the land froin the incorporation on 8 June 2002. Mr Roach says he has whakapapa connections to both the land and PKW. Minute Book: 159 AOT 147 [2] The 2002 annual general Ineeting of the incorporation endorsed the statu...

10. Stewart v Stewart - Kaiwaitau 6 and Other Blocks (2020) 236 Waiariki MB 37 (236 WAR 37) [pdf, 193 KB]

    ...seek directions? (c) Should any of the trustees be removed? (d) Should the trust order be varied? He kōrero whānui Background [4] The whānau trust was constituted on 3 December 2009 by order of the Māori Land Court.1 The trust was formed to hold the Māori land interests of Leslie Oliphant Stewart, the father of the applicant and the respondents, for the benefit of his whānau. The original trustees 1 350 Ro...