Search Results

1. [2021] NZACC 130 - Dunnage v ACC (6 August 2021) [pdf, 465 KB]

   ...works owned by Alliance Group in Invercargill (AGL). It was his third season with ALG when in March 2011 he developed pain in his shoulder or shoulders. When his symptoms had not improved after a month, he went to see his GP who filled out a claim form. A claimant cover questionnaire stated that Mr Black had constant pain in his left shoulder. His task at the freezing works was to remove any pelt left after another machine had removed most of it. He had to do some trimming w...

2. Waitangi Tribunal theme Q - Inland waterways - lakes [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   R a n ga haua Wha n ui Nat i ona l Them e q I N L A N D WAT E RWAYS : L A K E S B E N W H I TE M arch 1 9 9 8 Fi rs t R ele ase WAI TA NGI T R I BU NA L R A NGA H AUA W H A N U I SE R I E S Other Rangahaua Whanui reports District reports District 1: Auckland (pt i), R Daamen, P Hamer, and Dr B Rigby; (pt ii), M Belgrave District 5b: Poverty Bay, S Daly District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B Bargh District 8: The Alienation of Maori Land in the Rohe Potae, C Marr District 9: T

3. Taka v Watene - Koparakore A32A2B3B (2017) 34 Tākitimu MB 163 (34 TKT 163) [pdf, 427 KB]

   ...of giving the house site for Reihana and again for the purpose of the present application. This suggests partition is the only practical one which can be made, though it will be necessary at some later stage to give better access from the old formed road along the back of Reihana’s section. [21] Immediately following, Patu Taka Wairama further divided Koparakore A32A2A into four lots of ¼ acre each (approximately 1,000 square metres), a section for himself and one for each of...

4. 2020-02-19 Simon Wilson Reply [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...is accepted. 53 When writing Schedule 10A.4 it was considered unreasonable to apply an efficiency component to monthly and annual volumes given the short- term nature of the replacement consents. I would however be open to including this if requested by OWRUG. The complexity of Schedule 10A.4 54 A number of submitters including Mr McIndoe and Ms Bright have stated that Schedule 10A.4 is overly complex. 55 The Council has automated scripts for applying Schedule 10A.4 which mea...

5. [2019] NZEnvC 161 Egmont Refuse and Recycling Limited v South Taranaki District Council [pdf, 14 MB]

   ...his opinion that "the revised proposal promotes the purpose of the Act by ensuring the community has a more effective means of sustainably processing recyclable materials which in turn will assist with reasonably meeting the needs of future generations".4 [14] Following receipt of the 5 July consent memorandum the Court issued a Minute requesting further information on certain conditions. A response was provided by joint memorandum dated 26 August 2019. Consideration [...

6. [2014] NZEmpC 118 Pyne Gould Corp Ltd v West [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...careful to ensure that the relevant act was performed in their capacity as legal advisers, especially if their activities and duties also extend to other work. This does not mean that every communication to the in-house counsel must be an express request for legal advice or that every communication from him or her must amount specifically to legal advice. But to be privileged, the communications must be directly related to the performance of the adviser in his or her professiona...

7. 2022-02-11 Statement of Evidence of Rachel Ozanne dated 11 February 2022 incl appendices [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE ENV-2020-CHC-128 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) IN THE MATTER of the Omnibus Plan Change - Plan Change 8, being part of a proposal of national significance directed by the Minister for the Environment to be referred to the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA AND IN THE MATTER of an application under section 149T of the RMA

8. [2021] NZEnvC 130 City Rail Link Limited [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...any substantive predetermination. b) Construction timeframes are extremely tight. In order to achieve these, and the benefits of the alteration, a decision on the alteration is required by December 2021. c) Background: i) CRLL lodged a request with Council under section 198B of the RMA to allow the requirement to be directly referred to the Environment Court for determination on 25 June 2021 (i.e. contemporaneously with the NoR). Council approved that request under secti...

9. ENV-2016-AKL-000275 Dilworth Trust Board v New Zealand Transport Agency [pdf, 10 MB]

   ...Viaduct'. 9. Management of the alleged effects of neighbouring land uses is proposed to occur by the requirement to obtain the Respondent's approval to any structure within the designation boundary under s 176(1 )(b) of the Act. In considering that request for approval the Designation confines the Respondent to consider only the adverse effects on traffic safety on the carriageway of the Newmarket Viaduct caused by: • Obstruction to identified sight lines; • Lighting;...

10. [2022] NZEnvC 197 Aurora Energy Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2.6 MB]

    ...Space and Recreation. Except that: a. • The following are exempt from Rule 39.5.2: i. Minor upgrading of electricity transmission and distribution or telecommunication lines. ii. The addition of a single supporting structure within formed legal road, where it is reguired to provide a customer connection to an existing line. iii. New mid-span support structures within formed legal road, where these are reguired on an existing line to meet the safety clearance reguiremen...