2863 items matching your search terms
...rather than merits 5 Geotherm Group Limited Decisions A 47/06 and A151/06 (Environment Court) 6 The Logic of Liberty: Reflections and Rejoinders (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1951) 7 The forms and limits of adjudication (1978-1979) 92 Harvard L Rev353-1st written in 1957 and revised in 1959 and 1961 and published posthumously. 15 appeals, particularly in the UK where there is emphasis on administrative decision-making in...
...prospective purchasers as to the complainants’ price expectations, in breach of rr 9.1 and 9.4 of the Real Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2012 (“the Rules”); and [b] misled the complainants by providing false information regarding a prospective purchaser’s comments on the value of the property, in breach of r 6.4 of the Rules. [2] Mr Sheldon admits that he sent a text to prospective purchasers inviting expressions of interest in the propert...
...under section 279(1) of the Act, such order being by consent, rather than representing a decision or determination on the merits. The Court understands for present purposes that: (a) All parties to the proceedings have executed the memorandum requesting this order; and (b) All parties are satisfied that all matters proposed for the Court’s endorsement fall within the Court’s jurisdiction, and conform to the relevant requirements and objectives of the Act including, in particu...
...acceptable. Nevertheless, all parties seem to agree that reliance should not be put on this when the proposed Plan becomes operative. The Courts process of Appeals and Inquiries [16] The parties have engaged in an extensive period of mediation at their request with several extensions granted, again at the request of the parties. Matters have also been affected by the imposition of constraints at Level 4 and Level 3 of Covid-19 which has delayed some of the earlier hearings. Neverthe...
...with him “on a number of occasions”. 1 KL v [JJ] Holdings Ltd [2015] NZHC [xxxx]. 2 KL v [JJ] Holdings Ltd [2015] NZHC [xxxx] 3 KL v [JJ] Holdings Ltd, above n 1, at [28]. 3 [13] She requested “appropriate orders” against Mr CD and a review of the legal fees he charged her. (1) Instructions to present a counteroffer [14] Ms AB claimed that, having received the vendors’ 6 October 2015 offer to sell the property t...
436 Aotea MB 209 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20190004669 WĀHANGA Under Sections 67 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Manu Ariki Māori Reservation I WAENGA I A Between MARIE STEWART Te Kaitono Applicant ME And MANU ARIKI MARAE RESERVATION TRUST and TE KOTAHITANGA SOCIETY INCORPORATED Ngā Tangata Whaitake Interested Parti
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC r=J-q of the Resource Management Act 1991 of a Notice of Motion under s 87G of the Act requesting the granting of resource consents for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America's Cup in Auckland PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED ('PANUKU') (ENV-2018-AKL-0
...in the context of a few of the ten sub-precincts. Two consequential amendments have been made to this precinct. The first is to introduce provision for new buildings and structures accessory to pastoral farming, cropping and other non-intensive forms of land production, and additions to existing structures, up to 50m2 as a permitted activity. This is to align the activity listing for this precinct with other parts of the Plan, and particularly the overlays applying to large parts of th...
...around May or June of 2016, Ms Sun met with BR and an associate of two prospective purchasers, WZ, at the subdivision. The two prospective purchasers were IM and DI. During that meeting it is alleged by the Committee that Ms Sun and/or BR informed WZ that Lots 1 and 2 of the subdivision each had a net area of 603 m2, and that 3 the purchasers would be able to build a large property of 400 m2, and a swimming pool on each lot due to their size. [10] During another visit to t...
...granted NZS. She applied to include XXXX in her NZS entitlement as a non-qualifying spouse (NQS) because he did not meet the residency requirements to qualify for NZS in his own right. In February 2014, when XXXX completed a personal details form, she declared that her pension was RMB 570 per month, approximately NZD 26. The Ministry accepted her declaration and assessed the appellants’ income as being below the threshold for deduction. [5] The Ministry cannot locate its re...