Search Results

1. AI v ZR LCRO 102 / 2010 (11 February 2011) [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...Committee’s decision, the substance of the Applicant’s complaint was as follows: That the Respondent showed incompetence in the area of law and as a result the Applicant suffered a great disadvantage. The Respondent did not keep the Applicant informed and that there had been unnecessary delays in progressing this matter, which the Applicant believed were deliberate to generate more money for the Respondent. The Applicant believed that if the Respondent had given him adeq...

2. [2016] NZEmpC 144 Rossiter v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 123 KB]

   ...(AFFCO). The stay is to operate until the Court of Appeal decides two proceedings. It has already decided one and is to hear an application for leave to appeal another judgment of this Court on 28 November 2016, so counsel for the plaintiff informs the Court. [2] The timetabling direction made by the Court in its Minute of 29 September 2016 provided for the defendant to make written submissions to the Court on the s 179(5) issue with the plaintiff being able to respond likewise t...

3. VT Ltd v BN [2020] NZDT 1535 (30 April 2020) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...visit meeting that he would also be signing the Joint Expert Report. Apparently other experts at the meeting objected to this because they did not consider that KQ met the requirements to hold himself out as an ‘expert’ because he did not have a formal building professional qualification. 27. I dismiss BN’s claim in this regard. 28. It is not in dispute that neither BN or Mr C directly told VT that only CD was to sign the Joint Expert Report. There was some dispute whether BN...

4. Family legal aid response to consultation [pdf, 565 KB]

   ...customer progress through family justice services. It is intended to be simple and easy to use, reducing the administrative requirements for the client, providers and the Ministry. A helpdesk is being established to support providers. RMS will generate the forms required by providers to complete specific activities, such as the funding test. Relevant Ministry staff will have access to RMS, so providers will not be required to upload or send documents. A privacy impact assessm...

5. Appendix-14-Regional-Councils-Response-to-combined-request-for-information-under-section-92.pdf [pdf, 538 KB]

   ...Level 5, The Majestic Centre 100 Willis Street PO Box 5084 Wellington 6011 New Zealand T 64 4 894 5200 F 64 4 894 3305 www.nzta.govt.nz 1 Tēnā tātou, Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project- – Response to request for additional information pursuant to section 92 of the Resource Management Act 1991 This letter provides a response to the request for further information pursuant to section 92 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (“RMA”) receive...

6. 5_WK-respose-to-Regional-Councils-request-for-information-under-section-92-final-v2.pdf [pdf, 538 KB]

   ...Resource Management Act 1991 (“RMA”) received on 9th December 2022 in relation to the applications for resources consents1 to authorise the Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project (“Ō2NL Project” or “the Project”) The information requested and the Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (“Waka Kotahi”) response is set out in the following table. No. Jurisdiction Information requested Waka Kotahi response Surface Water Takes 1. MWRC a) The Applicant has outlined that pa...

7. Online manual HCC Policy and procedures v3.2 [pdf, 359 KB]

   High Cost Case Management (HCC) Policy and procedure Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the informatio

8. EMPC Swearing in Judge Perkins [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...Judge I acknowledge especially the following: Mrs Margaret Perkins. We regret that your daughter Katherine Perkins cannot be with us today, having very recently gifted you another grandchild I understand. Also present is Sir Bruce Slane who was formerly in partnership with Judge Perkins in the firm Cairns Slane. I also acknowledge the presence of Mrs Margaret Johnson: the late Chief Judge of the District Court, Russell Johnson, was a good friend and colleague to us all. I als...

9. CAC 20004 V Lindsay [2013] NZREADT 113 [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...complainant, in relation to his possible tender on a property at 32-36 Rimu Street, Eastbourne (property), when, 2 from 7 May 2012, the defendant had a possible interest in the property; and/or (ii) participating in the tender having obtained information from the complainant, which would put the defendant at an advantage or perceived advantage. (b) Rule 6.3: The defendant’s conduct was likely to bring the profession into disrepute, in that the defendant submitted a tende...

10. Nedelcu v Accident Compensation Corporation (Suspension of Entitlements) [2023] NZACC 191 [pdf, 339 KB]

    ...had a serious problem, so the next day went to the emergency department at North Shore Hospital where he was advised to go to Shorecare. Dr Hilton Jones examined Mr Nedelcu and made a recommendation for him to see a physiotherapist. An ACC45 request for cover for a lumbar sprain was lodged with the Corporation by Dr Jones, whose consultation notes stated that Mr Nedelcu had lumbar spine pain which was referred into his buttocks. Cover was granted by the Corporation on 11 February...